 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13
11-04-2013, 06:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
No.
I just don’t understand what all the hubbub is about, with the exception of the very funny and witty commentary. I think the description is straight forward. Actually I think it shows the strength and intelligence of the house to present the card in the manner in which they have. Straight forward and carefully worded, qualified, explained. If you do not want to spend the money, then don’t bid. I would rather have a card that is - possibly a partial Honus Wagner card – than some academic variation, that is of little historical value - and may even consist of a dot on a common player card. But everyone is entitled to spend their money how they wish! 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 Walter Johnson Portrait /w Scarce Partial Factory 30 Number on Back PSA 3.5 | Sean1125 | T206 cards B/S/T | 12 | 08-23-2013 10:42 AM |
| Honus Wagner T206 Piedmont Back | BlueDevil89 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 01-10-2013 02:59 PM |
| t206 Wagner & 350 Piedmont Back | pirates60 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-11-2011 05:08 AM |
| T206 Honus Wagner with Chesterfield back? :) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-24-2009 06:52 PM |
| Is that freaking NASA T206 Wagner back? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-17-2002 10:19 AM |
Threaded Mode