Greatest of all time

[pokerplyr80]

With a couple of threads about the greatest living player, I figured why not start one to see who everyone's top 5, or 10 of all time are. I'll start it out with mine.

1. Ruth
2. Mays
3. Cobb
4. Williams
5. Mantle

[Jlighter]

Originally Posted by pokerplyr80

With a couple of threads about the greatest living player, I figured why not start one to see who everyone's top 5, or 10 of all time are. I'll start it out with mine.

1. Ruth
2. Mays
3. Cobb
4. Williams
5. Mantle

Replace Mantle with Gehrig and you have a list.

[Louieman]

1. Ruth
2. Mays
3. Satchel Paige
4. Bonds
5. Henderson

[Enfuego]

1. Ruth
2. Cobb
3. Mays
4. Gherig
5. Mantle

[Vintagevault13]

1. Gehrig
2. Ruth
3. Aaron
4. Mays
5. Cobb

[Peter_Spaeth]

Ruth Mays Cobb Williams Wagner

then

Aaron Gehrig Musial Mantle Hornsby

would rate pitchers separately

[jerrys]

1. Ruth
2. Cobb
3. Mays
4. Gehrig
5. Williams

[iwantitiwinit]

1. Ruth
2. Gehrig
3. Cobb
4. Williams
5. DiMaggio

[bbsports]

1. Ruth
2. Cobb
3. Joe Jackson
4. Gehrig
5. Williams

[j_cook]

I think Bonds would be a unanimous top 5 if you just look at what he did on the field. But it's impossible to know just how good the PED era stars really were. I've heard that Bonds was like a modern day version of Babe Ruth.

[darwinbulldog]

1. Babe Ruth
2. Walter Johnson
3. Cy Young
4. Willie Mays
5. Barry Bonds

If you take out the pitchers (other than Ruth of course),

1. Babe Ruth
2. Willie Mays
3. Barry Bonds
4. Ty Cobb
5. Rogers Hornsby

[Joshchisox08]

1. Cobb HANDS DOWN
2. Walter Johnson
3. Willie Mays
4. Babe Ruth
5. Stan Musial

[chipperhank44]

This was an interesting question for me. As far as batters are concerned, I had a pretty definitive list in my head. That said, I am also from the school of thought that OPS is the greatest indicator of a batter's value. So I looked up the career leaders in OPS and found an interesting top 5. (and yes I realize that defense and steals are not accounted for in OPS, but defense is hard as hell to quantify and I never saw any of these guys with my own eyes so the eyeball test is out the window, I will focus on hitting)

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx (skipped Bonds)
5. Greenberg


Now I am looking at a top 5 list and saying to myself, really, Greenberg and Foxx in my top 5? So I consider the following question, aren't hits and steals combined just as valuable as a double, if not more so? So I do the following:

Ty Cobb has 3053 total singles in his career and 897 total stolen bases. Why not subtract the total stolen bases from the number of singles and give those hits plus singles the value of a double in the slugging percentage equation. So I do this, and it works out as follows.

Ty Cobb

Total 1B - 2156 (singles minus stolen bases)
Total 2B - 1621 (doubles plus stolen bases)
Total 3B - 295
Total HR - 117
Total AB - 11434

With these numbers, Cobb's career SLG% is elevated from .512 to .590. When combined with his career OBP of .433 you get an OPS (adjusted for steals) of 1.023, which is good enough for 5th place (excluding Bonds) on the all time OPS list.

I know there all holes in this logic, like the fact that every SB is not combined with a hit, many are after walks or HBP, but this was just my attempt to make OPS fair to the base thief. The ability to turn a walk, HBP, or single into a runner in scoring position is invaluable, so I had to account for it somehow. I'm sure if I added Greenberg or Hornsby's steals to their slugging calculation, they might overtake Cobb on the OPS list, but Cobb belongs IMO and this is how I reconciled it.

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx
5. Cobb


Not sure if this is a novel idea or if someone is going to tell me OPS adjusted for steals is already a thing, but either way, I like it quite a lot.

[MattyC]

Gehrig
Ruth
Williams
Mantle
Cobb
Shoeless
Musial
Bonds
Aaron
Mays
*Hon Mention Foxx

[JustinD]

Ruth
Williams
Mays
Josh Gibson
Bonds

[Cozumeleno]

1. Babe Ruth
2. Ty Cobb
3. Walter Johnson
4. Barry Bonds
5. Ted Williams

If you asked me in five minutes, I might very well find a place for Christy Mathewson.

[Orioles1954]

Craig Worthington
Tim Hulett
Mike Devereaux
Mickey Tettleton
Steve Finley

[Joshwesley]

Originally Posted by Orioles1954

Craig Worthington
Tim Hulett
Mike Devereaux
Mickey Tettleton
Steve Finley

No Brady Anderson?

[Orioles1954]

Originally Posted by Joshwesley

No Brady Anderson?

Nah, true Orioles fans love Devo.

Honorable Mention: Jim "The Whammer" Traber

[Joshchisox08]

Originally Posted by chipperhank44

This was an interesting question for me. As far as batters are concerned, I had a pretty definitive list in my head. That said, I am also from the school of thought that OPS is the greatest indicator of a batter's value. So I looked up the career leaders in OPS and found an interesting top 5. (and yes I realize that defense and steals are not accounted for in OPS, but defense is hard as hell to quantify and I never saw any of these guys with my own eyes so the eyeball test is out the window, I will focus on hitting)

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx (skipped Bonds)
5. Greenberg


Now I am looking at a top 5 list and saying to myself, really, Greenberg and Foxx in my top 5? So I consider the following question, aren't hits and steals combined just as valuable as a double, if not more so? So I do the following:

Ty Cobb has 3053 total singles in his career and 897 total stolen bases. Why not subtract the total stolen bases from the number of singles and give those hits plus singles the value of a double in the slugging percentage equation. So I do this, and it works out as follows.

Ty Cobb

Total 1B - 2156 (singles minus stolen bases)
Total 2B - 1621 (doubles plus stolen bases)
Total 3B - 295
Total HR - 117
Total AB - 11434

With these numbers, Cobb's career SLG% is elevated from .512 to .590. When combined with his career OBP of .433 you get an OPS (adjusted for steals) of 1.023, which is good enough for 5th place (excluding Bonds) on the all time OPS list.

I know there all holes in this logic, like the fact that every SB is not combined with a hit, many are after walks or HBP, but this was just my attempt to make OPS fair to the base thief. The ability to turn a walk, HBP, or single into a runner in scoring position is invaluable, so I had to account for it somehow. I'm sure if I added Greenberg or Hornsby's steals to their slugging calculation, they might overtake Cobb on the OPS list, but Cobb belongs IMO and this is how I reconciled it.

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx
5. Cobb


Not sure if this is a novel idea or if someone is going to tell me OPS adjusted for steals is already a thing, but either way, I like it quite a lot.

Interesting way of looking at his singles to Stolen Bases. Though I'm sure a lot of Stolen Bases were to Third After a Double too or to Home after a Triple.

I like your interpretation of converting his stolen bases into doubles just not where you placed Cobb

[Tabe]

Originally Posted by Orioles1954

Tim Hulett

I must seem like Tim Hulett's biggest fan to some folks - I have 8-10 game worn jerseys of his.

Of course, they're all from his tenure with the Spokane Indians as their manager, and I only buy them because we wear the same size and his jerseys are always cheap, but hey... I've got them

[Tabe]

My five would look something like:

1) Ruth
2) Bonds
3) Mantle
4) Mays
5) Williams

[glchen]

(1) Ruth
(2) Cobb
(3) Williams
(4) Mays
(5) Gehrig
(6) Stan Musial
(7) Walter Johnson
(8) Christy Mathewson
(9) Rogers Hornsby
(10) Honus Wagner

[MartyFromCANADA]

Ruth, Robinson, Mays, Aaron, Rose

[chipperhank44]

Originally Posted by Joshchisox08

Interesting way of looking at his singles to Stolen Bases. Though I'm sure a lot of Stolen Bases were to Third After a Double too or to Home after a Triple.

I like your interpretation of converting his stolen bases into doubles just not where you placed Cobb

Oh trust me, I think Cobb belongs at the top of the list, but was trying a purely statistical way of ranking hitters. I would have also had Aaron in my top 5. Tough to keep the HR champ and RBI champ off the list, but "greatest" can be based on a number of things, longevity vs dominance is a tough argument.

[brewing]

Originally Posted by Cozumeleno

1. Babe Ruth
2. Ty Cobb
3. Walter Johnson
4. Barry Bonds
5. Ted Williams

If you asked me in five minutes, I might very well find a place for Christy Mathewson.

That guy that didn't make the top 4 all time Giants. Maybe you should consider Buster Posey.

Kidding of course.

[bnorth]

1 Ted Williams
2 Ty Cobb
3 Babe Ruth
4 Barry Bonds
5 Roger Clemens
6 Wade Boggs Ok not really on Boggs but he is my all time favorite player. Show me a man that can drink more Miller Lights on a flight and I will remove him

[Orioles1954]

Originally Posted by MartyFromCANADA

Ruth, Robinson, Mays, Aaron, Rose

Good one. Brooks Robinson should be on more of these lists.

[aro13]

I would put Ruth first and Bonds second. After that it would be very tough in my mind.

For all of those who picked Ruth and Gehrig 1st/2nd how do you justify the fact they `only' won four pennants in the 10 years they played together between 1925 and 1934. It is not like they were carrying a crap team - they had a hall of famer at catcher (Dickey) at second (Lazzeri) at third (Sewell) and in centerfield (Combs) and four starting pitchers in the Hall of Fame (Hoyt, Pennock, Gomez and Ruffing) for much of the time.

[Cozumeleno]

Originally Posted by brewing

That guy that didn't make the top 4 all time Giants. Maybe you should consider Buster Posey.

Kidding of course.

Haha, yeah, it was really difficult for me in deciding to include Bonds or not. I had to include him for a bunch of reasons, though.

He was already the best player in baseball before steroids with three (should have been four straight) MVPs. Then there's the eye test - it was ridiculous how dominant he was and for a five-year stretch, you expected him to homer or walk. With eight Gold Gloves, he was a superior defensive player as well. And just for fun, he went out and stole 500 bases. He was quite arguably the most complete player ever.

What bothers me is that he's often lumped in with Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa, who were both breaking down well before they reached 40. Even at 41 and 42 in his last two seasons, he still led the league in walks, intentional walks, and on base percentage. He was so much better than those guys that it's not even funny.

I know the PEDs will keep him off of these types of list for many, and I get that. It's totally fair - dude cheated. But if you're asking me for the list of best players, I have to include him.

[jbl79]

Position Players

1. Ruth
2. Mays
3. Bonds
4. Williams
5. Cobb
6. Gehrig
7. Aaron
8. Musial
9. Mantle
10. Hornsby

Pitchers:

1. W. Johnson
2. Grove
3. Clemens
4. R. Johnson
5. Seaver
6. Mathewson
7. Maddux
8. Martinez
9. Koufax
10. Cy Young

[perezfan]

There's no Catcher listed. I'd replace Mantle with Johnny Bench, and replace Pedro Martinez with Warren Spahn. Good lists!

[jbl79]

Originally Posted by perezfan

There's no Catcher listed. I'd replace Mantle with Johnny Bench, and replace Pedro Martinez with Warren Spahn. Good lists!

Very subjective when doing these types of lists...which makes it so much fun. If I was doing a starting 9...Bench may very well be the starter on my all-time team.

Spahn is another great choice and very underrated.

[SteveMitchell]

Alexander
Cobb
Gehrig
Hornsby
Mays
Ruth
Schmidt
Wagner
Williams

If we must have a catcher, take your pick: Bench, Berra or Cochrane.

[darwinbulldog]

Originally Posted by SteveMitchell

Alexander
Cobb
Gehrig
Hornsby
Mays
Ruth
Schmidt
Wagner
Williams

If we must have a catcher, take your pick: Bench, Berra or Cochrane.

Bench. Or maybe Josh Gibson if we're not limiting it to MLB. Personally I'd take Carter before either Berra or Cochrane.

[vintagebb2014]

1. Ruth
2. Ty Cobb
3. Mathewson
4. Gehrig
5. Walter Johnson

I am very skeptical of any player Post 1980's due to PED's. My list is based on skill, impact on the game and individual records.

[pokerplyr80]

I had left Bonds off of my list for obvious reasons. If we ignore the steroid issue he would have been #4 on my list.

[Orioles1954]

Originally Posted by vintagebb2014

1. Ruth
2. Ty Cobb
3. Mathewson
4. Gehrig
5. Walter Johnson

I am very skeptical of any player Post 1980's due to PED's. My list is based on skill, impact on the game and individual records.

That is mitigated by the fact that these players weren't allowed to face the best African-American ball players.

[vintagehofrookies]

my Top 5 hitters:
Cobb
Ruth
Mays
Bonds
Aaron

my top 5 Pitchers:
Johnson
Mathewson
Paige
Ryan
Clemens

[robw1959]

Barry Bonds, as far as I know, has never hit a 500-foot home run. In 1920, the first year that Ruth became an every day player for the Yankees, he hit a 500-foot home run in EVERY American league ballpark he visited. In modern day parlance, Babe Ruth was a freak.

[Jlighter]

Originally Posted by robw1959

Barry Bonds, as far as I know, has never hit a 500-foot home run. In 1920, the first year that Ruth became an every day player for the Yankees, he hit a 500-foot home run in EVERY American league ballpark he visited. In modern day parlance, Babe Ruth was a freak.

Not really sure what that proves in a conversation of greatest of all time. Evan Gattis hit the longest homerun of the year two seasons ago. Would you like to argue he's the best player in baseball?

[brewing]

Originally Posted by Orioles1954

That is mitigated by the fact that these players weren't allowed to face the best African-American ball players.

+1

[packs]

Babe Ruth is the single greatest player of all time, and greatest all around player as well. No one else will ever do what he was able to do on a baseball field. He out hit the entire American League by himself. I don't need to tell anyone about his dominance as a pitcher too. There will never be another player who dominates the game like he did.

Originally Posted by bnorth

1 Ted Williams
2 Ty Cobb
3 Babe Ruth
4 Barry Bonds
5 Roger Clemens
6 Wade Boggs Ok not really on Boggs but he is my all time favorite player. Show me a man that can drink more Miller Lights on a flight and I will remove him

Sox fan?

[Jdoggs]

Babe Ruth greatest of all time.
After that mays, bonds, williams, and mantle.

[Greg Sonk]

Ruth

Bonds
Cobb
Mays
Walter Johnson

I am so happy to see a lack of unobjective Jeteresque occurrences in these lists.

Originally Posted by chipperhank44

This was an interesting question for me. As far as batters are concerned, I had a pretty definitive list in my head. That said, I am also from the school of thought that OPS is the greatest indicator of a batter's value. So I looked up the career leaders in OPS and found an interesting top 5. (and yes I realize that defense and steals are not accounted for in OPS, but defense is hard as hell to quantify and I never saw any of these guys with my own eyes so the eyeball test is out the window, I will focus on hitting)

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx (skipped Bonds)
5. Greenberg


Now I am looking at a top 5 list and saying to myself, really, Greenberg and Foxx in my top 5? So I consider the following question, aren't hits and steals combined just as valuable as a double, if not more so? So I do the following:

Ty Cobb has 3053 total singles in his career and 897 total stolen bases. Why not subtract the total stolen bases from the number of singles and give those hits plus singles the value of a double in the slugging percentage equation. So I do this, and it works out as follows.

Ty Cobb

Total 1B - 2156 (singles minus stolen bases)
Total 2B - 1621 (doubles plus stolen bases)
Total 3B - 295
Total HR - 117
Total AB - 11434

With these numbers, Cobb's career SLG% is elevated from .512 to .590. When combined with his career OBP of .433 you get an OPS (adjusted for steals) of 1.023, which is good enough for 5th place (excluding Bonds) on the all time OPS list.

I know there all holes in this logic, like the fact that every SB is not combined with a hit, many are after walks or HBP, but this was just my attempt to make OPS fair to the base thief. The ability to turn a walk, HBP, or single into a runner in scoring position is invaluable, so I had to account for it somehow. I'm sure if I added Greenberg or Hornsby's steals to their slugging calculation, they might overtake Cobb on the OPS list, but Cobb belongs IMO and this is how I reconciled it.

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx
5. Cobb


Not sure if this is a novel idea or if someone is going to tell me OPS adjusted for steals is already a thing, but either way, I like it quite a lot.

I like this post so much and I don't even agree with some of the logic.

Sabermetrics are not a boogeyman come to carelessly toss away the history of the game, they are simply attempts to more accurately quantify performance. You had the logical thought that a weakness with OPS is its ignoracne of speed and set out to fix it.

For the record, if you're looking for something that accounts for speed in a similar way, check out wOBA. It's an excellent attempt to iron out the combined flaws of OPS, SLG, and AVG.

[howard38]

Originally Posted by chipperhank44

This was an interesting question for me. As far as batters are concerned, I had a pretty definitive list in my head. That said, I am also from the school of thought that OPS is the greatest indicator of a batter's value. So I looked up the career leaders in OPS and found an interesting top 5. (and yes I realize that defense and steals are not accounted for in OPS, but defense is hard as hell to quantify and I never saw any of these guys with my own eyes so the eyeball test is out the window, I will focus on hitting)

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx (skipped Bonds)
5. Greenberg


Now I am looking at a top 5 list and saying to myself, really, Greenberg and Foxx in my top 5? So I consider the following question, aren't hits and steals combined just as valuable as a double, if not more so? So I do the following:

Ty Cobb has 3053 total singles in his career and 897 total stolen bases. Why not subtract the total stolen bases from the number of singles and give those hits plus singles the value of a double in the slugging percentage equation. So I do this, and it works out as follows.

Ty Cobb

Total 1B - 2156 (singles minus stolen bases)
Total 2B - 1621 (doubles plus stolen bases)
Total 3B - 295
Total HR - 117
Total AB - 11434

With these numbers, Cobb's career SLG% is elevated from .512 to .590. When combined with his career OBP of .433 you get an OPS (adjusted for steals) of 1.023, which is good enough for 5th place (excluding Bonds) on the all time OPS list.

I know there all holes in this logic, like the fact that every SB is not combined with a hit, many are after walks or HBP, but this was just my attempt to make OPS fair to the base thief. The ability to turn a walk, HBP, or single into a runner in scoring position is invaluable, so I had to account for it somehow. I'm sure if I added Greenberg or Hornsby's steals to their slugging calculation, they might overtake Cobb on the OPS list, but Cobb belongs IMO and this is how I reconciled it.

1. Ruth
2. Williams
3. Gehrig
4. Foxx
5. Cobb


Not sure if this is a novel idea or if someone is going to tell me OPS adjusted for steals is already a thing, but either way, I like it quite a lot.

If you count a single followed by a stolen base as a double then you should also count a single followed by a caught stealing as an out instead of a hit. In Cobb's case that would probably be in the neighborhood of 400 fewer hits.

[ls7plus]

Originally Posted by Jlighter

Replace Mantle with Gehrig and you have a list.

In a word, no. Gehrig's stats appear so much better because he played most of his career in the era when it was far and away the easiest time to score runs. No relief specialists, no night games, no west coast travel, smaller gloves, no sliders, etc. In reality, Mantle had a higher percentage of runs created as against league average than Gehrig (though not by a lot), one of, if not THE best yardstick for comparing players of different eras, where the game was played under significantly different conditions. Both, by the way, are among just 8 or so players who created more than 200% of league average runs scored during the eras in which they played.

This is a little like author Roger Kahn saying that Stan Musial was the greatest hitter he ever saw, as if it remained a matter of opinion after the sabermetric revolution. No, Roger, no. While Musial was indeed great, you also saw Ted Williams and Mantle--both were demonstrably, objectively and unequivocally greater.

Best player: Babe Ruth

Best hitter: Ted Williams (his CAREER runs created % vs league average of 250% beat Gehrig's best year, 249% in 1927)

Best pitcher: dead heat--Lefty Grove and Walter Johnson

Regards to all,

Larry

[the 'stache]

I can't mix hitters and pitchers, because the game is so fundamentally different for them. How could you possibly say who is the better player of Walter Johnson or Willie Mays, when there is no statistical basis for doing so? It would be sheer opinion.

This is going to be very difficult.

Hitters:

Babe Ruth
Ted Williams
Ty Cobb
Lou Gehrig
Joe DiMaggio
Mickey Mantle
"Shoeless" Joe Jackson
Stan Musial
Willie Mays
Hank Aaron
Honus Wagner
Rogers Hornsby
Roberto Clemente
Johnny Bench
Barry Bonds
Rickey Henderson
Napolean Lajoie
Tris Speaker
Tony Gwynn


Pitchers:
Walter Johnson
Grover Cleveland Alexander
Sandy Koufax
Greg Maddux
Bob Feller
Bob Gibson
Cy Young
Tom Seaver
Roger Clemens
Lefty Grove

List is still evolving. It's impossible for me to limit my positional players to just ten. If I were to look at just the hitting aspect, maybe I could do it. But I can't ignore things like defense and base stealing.

If I am looking at the most complete positional player in history, it's a short list: Willie Mays is at the very top. Bonds is close behind (hard for me to compare because of the PED variable). DiMaggio wasn't a base stealer, but he did everything else very well. Hank Aaron is pretty high on that list. The others would be open to discussion. I think players like Clemente, Bench and Mike Schmidt are too often overlooked, or undervalued, when their complete game is looked at.

Most naturally gifted player? Mickey Mantle, without a doubt in my mind. With a myriad of injuries that would have crippled lesser athletes, what he accomplished as a baseball player was simply phenomenal. When I think of what a healthy Mantle would have done...with that power, that eye, and the legs he had before tearing up his knee for the first time... /shudder. A healthy Mantle could have put up numbers (at Yankee Stadium, no less) that would have never been approached.

[Peter_Spaeth]

You forgot (I hope) Cy Young.