 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
09-26-2013, 08:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
1915 CJ's... Am I Alone On This Preference?
I actually find examples with unobtrusive caramel staining more desirable than unblemished copies. To me, it's sort of like a badge of honor for the card, in that you can imagine someone pulling it from that CJ box a century ago. Just adds a certain charm and character to a specimen. So perhaps I'm nuts, but I'd bid higher on one with some well-placed stains. Be interesting to see where others shake out on this.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Graded Cards - Preference? | John V | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 03-06-2011 06:30 PM |
| Matting or free float? what's your preference? | baseballart | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 15 | 06-12-2010 04:17 PM |
| Question on PDF documents-- usability, preference, iphones, etc | drc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-04-2010 07:27 PM |
| Low grade preference | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-08-2005 01:47 PM |
| eBay # of days preference? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-05-2005 05:20 PM |
Threaded Mode