![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I need one of those, plus we are both Tiger fans, c'mon!
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
CW's outstanding CJ Cobb was one of the cards that really drew me into the older classics realm. That card was an inspiration. Glad to see someone else is already in pursuit of it!
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt, Chuck, I hope you don't mind me sharing this one. I don't know many on N54--mostly a CU guy, but thought I'd share this Matty.
![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with this philosophy regarding most...if not all cards. If a vintage card came with a story book of it's history...how boring a story would it be if it said..."I got this card from a man as he was leaving the smoke shop...I rushed home and put it in the middle of my bible...and never touched it again!"
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow, Dan. No stains but pretty special-- looks mint to me. What centering. Dayum!
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wheat.
__________________
http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/kdixon |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
I collect 1914/15 Cracker Jacks. 1915 Cracker Jack Set 99% complete. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
LOL!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Quote:
Is that the card that was recently given away in the Set Registry promotion? Either way, great card, Dan! Here's a couple 1914's... the Tinker was the first CJ I ever picked up -- just a small dab of caramel on the front of his jersey. The Crawford is more recent, and more stained, and sits in and SGC 60 holder. I might have only 5 or 6 cards from this issue, but they are among my faves. Much of their charm lies in their simplicity. I have to pick up that recent book on the set, too. Last edited by CW; 09-29-2013 at 02:20 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Oh, and, nice Cobb, Rich! At least the mouse stopped chewing before the "Cobb".
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back in the 70s i used to buy and sell, carmel, tobacco, cracker jack, goudeys cards etc with stains, glue, tape, writing, with absolutely no problem, and i guess the reason was because it seemed like about 1/2 the cards in existence had this issues! of course we always had a select few that wanted nothing to do
with such issues and these were the high class collectors and would pay more money for the cleaner cards, so some people/dealers learned how to clean this cards, so they could nail this high class collectors for more money!! now a days i wonder what happened to those thousands of cards with such issues that went through my hands?? OH YES is now called paper loss!! and is widely accepted. finally i think this stain issues are proof of authenticity sort of. Last edited by pepis; 09-29-2013 at 03:09 PM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I know right lol
__________________
I collect 1914/15 Cracker Jacks. 1915 Cracker Jack Set 99% complete. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is my 1914 CJ type card. If PSA hadn't put the (ST) qualifier on it I would not have been able to afford it. Sometimes qualifiers are a good thing!!
Last edited by leaflover; 09-30-2013 at 06:02 AM. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chuck, yes that is correct.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Graded Cards - Preference? | John V | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 03-06-2011 06:30 PM |
Matting or free float? what's your preference? | baseballart | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 15 | 06-12-2010 04:17 PM |
Question on PDF documents-- usability, preference, iphones, etc | drc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 02-04-2010 07:27 PM |
Low grade preference | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-08-2005 01:47 PM |
eBay # of days preference? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-05-2005 05:20 PM |