![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Saw this listing on Ebay yesterday -
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Lot-of-9-BGS...cAAOSwnipWY7a5 What is the possible benefit of purchasing cracked flips unless you plan on reusing them? I do not like the path this is headed.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
WOW! That should be illegal. You are right, what else could you do with these except use them for making fake flips? So I guess whoever buys them is probably a crook. And why would someone crack open cards that were graded a 10? VERY STRANGE
__________________
I collect Cardinals cards for team sets from all years. My want & trade lists are on my website here: http://bbcardzman.webs.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Those aren't 10's. Those are BCCG 10'S - which are Mint or better. A 9 really.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It was nice of him to include his address in the listing so that we can send him hate mail
![]()
__________________
Collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359235@N05/sets/ For Sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/132359...7719430982559/ Ebay listings: https://www.ebay.com/sch/harrydoyle/...p2047675.l2562 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The "why" to me is the grader. BCCG grading is not exactly considered worthy. So, perhaps cracking out a 10 in order to get a PSA/SGC/Beckett 10 is the idea. But, I agree with both of you. The only reason to buy the flips would be to do something less than reputable. Should it be illegal? Well, no. It is your stuff and I can't see any reason you can't sell it. But, I can't think of anyone that would use this stuff for anything beyond reselling other cards inside with these cert numbers.
I wonder if this is something that goes on: A crook submits a legitimate card and gets a grade. He cracks it and resubmits and gets another legitimate grade. He repeats this several times, thereby getting 6-7 cert numbers for one card. Then, he takes lesser (or fake) cards and uses the legit cert numbers. They come back legit, because the numbers are legit. Just not the cards. Nobody is the wiser.
__________________
Actively bouncing aimlessly from set to set trying to accomplish something, but getting nowhere |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yeah seen this a few days ago but look at the cards on them it Dosent matter
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There probably aren't many Beckett Slab fabricators out there. I have never seen one cracked that could be reused with or without the frosting.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I if they were real PSA flips that 10s or 9s than I would pay attention....not those flips..
remember if cards were resubmitted for the big payoff grade..that means the flips that weren't used are for a grade where it was worth it to try to get a higher grade. Last edited by 1952boyntoncollector; 12-29-2015 at 10:23 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Or is it me. ![]() Also, they just sold for $25 plus 3 shipping. Last edited by xplainer; 12-29-2015 at 10:34 AM. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Definitely a concern of someone doing something they shouldn't with these, but I believe there are many collectors that would just love to own them for their own personal collection, or like mentioned above as some sort of decoration. It's not illegal and I think we should keep an eye on it because we know what some of the dangers could be from this ordeal.
Believe it or not, flips have value to some without being attached to the card. Not everyone can afford to buy a Pete rose rookie, so to them owning a flip could be the next best thing. And who knows, maybe someone actually collects flips...it happens. Also it's an easy way for someone that cracked their slabs to make easy $$
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That being said, I doubt these flips present much of a risk. That this could be a trend, or that these sales are allowed at all does bother me.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. Last edited by pokerplyr80; 01-03-2016 at 10:26 PM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think Doug has read me wrong as much as I have him. I also very much appreciate the civil discussions on this, it is wonderful that we can all have differing opinions and not be silly about it.
In all honesty, I have NEVER submitted a card to a grading service. Talked about doing it, but never got around to it. Not to say that I certainly might in the future someday, but I too feel that the values for subjective grades are way overblown. Also, I would rather get more cards than pay for grading with my money. Here's where we differ though. If I am at a show or buying a card I can handle in person, I trust my skills and will buy raw in a second. Admittedly most of my collection is raw cards. However, when buying via the net or auction I admit I prefer a graded card. I can normally easily spot a fake, but the trimming is too prevalent and I have just gotten pissed off at card doctors. The annoyance of returning a card or finding out later due to laziness is draining. I like the partial safety net, whether or not it is 100%. I also know that if I want top dollar for my cards at resale if I choose to liquidate, I will need to grade them or face a heavy fiscal punishment...that's life. I buy raw cards to save money because they sell lower. The fraudsters and card trimmers have made the hobby what it is today...paranoid. If you want to take a stance or statement on grading it's fine with me, just realize the importance it has come to play in the hobby and how much damage to our collections it could do if that system collapses and those collectors that hope for that security, no matter how tenuous, drop out of the buying pool. If someone wants to measure the current importance of grading in investment cards, I ask them to break out a high grade card (52 mick, 1916 ruth) and sell it raw as a statement to put their money where their mouth is. I will wager it will have a hard time selling at half its graded counterparts. I can certainly hate the way the current is going, but it's a bitch to paddle against it. When graders get it wrong we all get up in arms, but hell, the only two things I know are always 100% are death and taxes. I'll take the better odds on anything any day, especially if all I am looking at is a possibly photoshopped scan from 1200 miles away.
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nope.
With no disrespect intended to you Justin, I didn't read you wrong because I haven't read the entirety of any of your posts. The reason that I often remove the name of the person I quote when I respond is because I do not mean my statements to be aimed directly at that person, I mean them to be aimed at anyone who agrees with the quote I'm responding to. My thoughts on "third party graders" as many like to call them, but who I prefer to call "the people who get paid for their opinions" was pretty much summed up in my second post to this thread, which I will repeat here : Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The great thing about my jokes is that they all make me laugh, and because I believe that a joke that makes anybody laugh is by definition a funny joke, that means all of my jokes are funny. To me. I don't really give a shit about what anybody else thinks. Except for Al. I like it when I think Al is getting a grin on his face as he watches me do my Public Enemy impersonation. Al didn't get that one, he's going to have to google that one (sorry Al). They're a rap act, who are also members of the Rock & Roll HOF Good night, Doug "paid opinions are the worst thing to happen to the hobby since Upper Deck introduced chase cards" Goodman PS - The irony of me posting such a long post after admitting to not reading Justin's long posts is not lost on me, but will be lost on many of you because you didn't read far enough to make it to this sentence. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'm a player collector of Chris Coghlan and given that I have almost all of his easy-to-obtain stuff I have to go for the obscure...which isn't that plentiful given that he's somewhat of an obscure player to begin with. If a loose flip of his popped up on ebay I'd buy it in a second if the price were reasonable. Why? I can't even tell you. I just know that if there's something of his that I don't have, I want it, even if it isn't catalogued. Just like people buy expired and USED redemptions (I'm guilty here too), people will buy these. My guess is the buyer intends to break the lot up. Of all the Rose collectors in the world, there has to be someone interested in a flip. Likewise for the other guys. Check out "expired redemption" on ebay and notice all the sales. This is the same thing, except that there are theoretically hundreds of expired redemptions out there... http://www.ebay.com/itm/Kris-Bryant-...8AAOSwbdpWYIej <---that's for a USED redemption! The market for ANYTHING unique is there. I wouldn't automatically jump to malice on the part of the buyers and sellers involved with these. Last edited by polakoff; 01-04-2016 at 06:23 AM. |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I didn't really think collectors would collect old flips just to collect them. Naive me....
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe one way to prevent people from reusing labels is to have an expiration date on each card that is graded. If you own a graded card whether you submitted it or not, you would just use some app to scan in the whole slab to register it again. The app would check it against its database to make sure the card matches the original one that was graded. If it does, them the it would extend the expiration date.
It's a far fetched idea but one never knows. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I don't understand collecting flips, but to each his own. |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think dismissing this because it's "only" BCCG is dangerous thinking. I doubt many members of this forum buy BCCG-graded cards, as we have a higher level of hobby sophistication. But what about the parents of kids who have expressed an interest in collecting for the first time? They might go online to EBay, searching for a birthday or Christmas present, and decide upon a BCCG 10 card of their kid's favorite player. Neither they, or their kid, will have any clue that they have been duped.
Are we looking to protect only ourselves, or everybody that might want to venture into baseball card collecting? This kind of abhorrent behavior has no place in our hobby. Period.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Concerning and worrisome...... | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-16-2014 07:34 AM |
Current trend in E card difficulty? | goudey1933 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 05-07-2012 08:41 AM |
A Trend? Or is This the Way the Board has Become? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 167 | 10-25-2007 08:35 AM |
New trend on ebay? Paypal scam | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 05-10-2003 01:36 AM |
Real Ruth with Worrisome Wear? Good Goudey Gone Bad? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 01-16-2002 08:10 AM |