![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Masson
Since Lew didn't get to the Ms in his encyclopedia, I know very little about the scarcity of the backs in the M116 set. Looking through my group, I find three different types. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Brian C Daniels
Do all M116s come in all three back variations? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: scott brockelman
while i am sure resident researcher Tim Newcomb will chime in, the normal set offers the 1st 21 series with either the 1st or 3rd back you picture. SOME of these can also be found with the 300 series back and were probably issued later in the team "series" envelopes. on series 22-24 we find the 300 series subjects which are the toughies to find in the set. normally anytime you find a 300 series back you have a tough card, but not always, again as they could have been the reissued back. similar to the anomoly of the T207 where any card that comes with a recruit won't be found with a cycle or broadleaf, BUT you will find an occasional anonymous. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Richard Masson
OK. I think I understand. Series 1-21 with the two common backs. Series 22-24 with the "300 subject" backs, generally. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
Sorry I didn't see this post when it cropped up over the holidays. I won't go into huge detail here, as I don't want to anticipate all of Bob's and my material for the projected article-- |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: jim
Scott, how do you tell by looking at the card, if you have one of the scarce 300 issue series or the re-issued 300 series? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
I have a Cy Young that PSA labeled as a "BLUE BACK"... |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Josh K.
I believe blue "back" refers to the color of the printing on the back of the card (which can be blue or black). If it says blue "background", I believe it refers to the background color on the front of the card. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Hal Lewis
Ahh... that makes sense. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: Tim Newcomb
A few more details to clarify: |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: warshawlaw
I have a pastel BG Mathewson with a series of 300 back. Where does that fall in the spectrum/should there be a multiplier on the value? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1911 M116 Ed Reulbach Scarcity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-27-2009 02:03 PM |
M116 VS E95 Caramels (Scarcity) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-27-2008 01:17 PM |
T205 backs -- scarcity? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 02-27-2008 07:56 AM |
T205 backs - order of scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-22-2007 08:50 PM |
M116 300 Subjects back scarcity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-22-2007 07:27 PM |