|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: hankron
There have been way too many anonymous posts lately. I'm hoping that Bill gives due notice or starts automatically deleting them all. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: runscott
It's very easy to create a Net 54 login. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Jeff De
Pardon me Hankron, What is an avitar? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Lee Behrens
Count me in favor of logging in. I think it will eleminate some unnecessary hassles that have risen and will continue to come up. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Adam J. Baxter
I don't think it's a crime if people forget to log in now and then, I certainly forget a lot. What I find annoying is the gutless posters who post anonymously just so they can take jabs at other posters. A Log-in requirement would be fine by me. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Hal Lewis
You should HAVE to log in. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Josh K.
I hope Im not the gutless poster that started this thread. I forgot to logon in response to the Bonds post. I made a joke about prewar vintage referring to the first Iraq war - before I could correct the post, the entire thread was gone. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Kevin Cummings
Hankron: |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Bill Cornell
My impression is that most people do log in now before posting. It certainly makes it easier for others to recognize you and get in touch, if needed, although I realize that people occasionally forget (or can't be bothered). |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: jay behrens
Bill, the only would be posters that logging in would scre away are the people that don't have the guts to ID themselves in the first place. There are tons of people that only lurk and this would not impact them. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Ryan Christoff
Count me as a vote for logging in. It takes 7 seconds to do and at least makes cowards who want to post anonymously have to go through the trouble of setting up a fake account just to post. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Gary B.
"there is an option that would allow only people who had logged in to post and give everyone else read-only rights. Would that scare off would-be posters? I don't know..." |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: leon
I will go with the flow and since my buddies think it best to log in I will vote that way too. For some reason it seems like the system won't let me post without doing it...so no sweat here. Lurkers can still lurk too.....later |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: John/z28jd
I also wouldnt mind having to log in to post,altho i admit i usually bypass it if im not already logged in from being in the chat.It would save Bill some time in editing my posts too for me |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: John
I can go either way, simply I think because no anonymous poster has ticked me off yet, when that happens then I will lean towards the login side. Either way happy to login before posting. The choice is yours Bill, for you have accepted the burden of leadership. With great power comes great responsibility…....oh and the ability to delete posts too. So you got that going for ya which must be nice. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: martindl
I've had a few anonymous posts lately but thats more to do with me being an idiot newbie than anything else. I log in and start typing witout filling my name in. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Chris
I am definately in favor of having to log in. After my situation with Lee last week, and me being a horses you know what, I was trying to apologize for mistakes I made, only to have my last ditch effort get shot down, not to mention the tongue lashing Aaron gave me for a post by another Chris that was misunderstood as me making snide comments about Lee. It left me in a situation where I was not only having to defend or apologize for the mistakes I made, but also defend myself for the harmless post of someone else who just happens to share my first name. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Anonymous
Dittos |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Julie
I don't even know sez I was born before the war of 1812, I'd like to be able to answer--IT. But that means taking up thread space, since we don't have to include our e-mail addresses to post, huh? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Joe P.
That wasn't you I saw with Molly Pitcher? |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: hankron
Kevin, it's debatable whether people take my photo advice to heart, but, if due to my posts, someone remembers the name of the unearthly 1960s Prussian fashion model (Veruschka), I'm satisfied. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Julie
...... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
Posted By: Peter Thomas
Julie - Molly was long before our time - Valley Forge - Veruschka I remember well - not before my time. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Note to Bill on Anonymous Posts
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just a note to say hello! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-07-2007 08:30 AM |
Anonymous posts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 06-09-2005 01:05 PM |
Anonymous Posts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 09-15-2002 07:02 AM |
Anonymous Posts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-02-2002 09:55 AM |
Anonymous Posts | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 02-27-2002 09:10 AM |