![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am a vintage guy so I know almost nothing about modern cards.
I found a couple of boxes of 1993 Upper Deck SP in a closet which I bought new. I opened the cards, put them back in the boxes and dropped them in storage. I can see at least a two Jeters in the pile but I have not gone through them carefully. Questions: 1) Is it worth even trying to get them graded? 2) If so, with whom? (my vintage stuff is PSA) 3) Should I consider having someone else submit them for me to increase the chances of a higher grade? Thoughts?
__________________
Actively building a 1953 Bowman Color PSA Registry Set (Currently 150/160) and attempting a 1947 Tip Top Bread Set. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm also a vintage guy so I don't have a ton to say - but my two cents are that if the Jeters are in really good shape, they could be worth grading. Those 1993 SP rookies are notoriously prone to chipping - if they're free from that malady, you could have something good.
__________________
I blog at https://adventuresofabaseballcardcollector.blogspot.com |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Worth grading depending on the condition: yes.
Were they stored in climate controlled rooms or subject to the elements? With the heat/humidity, they could be damaged due to their gloss being uneven. Do they measure properly at 2.5x3.5? PSA is probably your best ROI. You can now submit to COMC for cards worth under $499 through COMC at $22 a card, no minimum.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Assuming there are no noticeable defects, PSA is the way to go on the Jeters.
__________________
Working Sets: Baseball- T206 SLers - Virginia League (-1) 1952 Topps - low numbers (-1) 1953 Topps (-91) 1954 Bowman (-3) 1964 Topps Giants auto'd (-2) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For non-vintage and maximum resale value, PSA is the only choice. Very condition sensitive card and if it looks good its a no-brainer getting graded
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For not even seeing a picture of the cards, this thread has some speculative advice.
#1 Yes....possibly but pictures would help. #2 PSA, BGS, or SGC. #3 No Depending on the the look of the cards, PSA is not always the best option. SGC is quite simply the easiest and quickest option. No kids will be born while you wait for your SGC cards to return. I guess if you enjoy sending your cards and waiting until your 3rd child is born then maybe send them west. ![]() ![]() Last edited by vthobby; 11-16-2023 at 12:29 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1993 SP Derek Jeter | lug-nut | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 05-07-2022 09:17 AM |
FS: 1993 SP Derek Jeter PSA | lug-nut | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 03-06-2021 01:19 PM |
Wanted 1993 Derek Jeter Pinnacle PSA 10 | Mrmiamih | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 12-03-2020 02:04 PM |
FS: 1993 Topps Derek Jeter PSA 8 & 1993 Topps Gold Derek Jeter PSA 8.5 | wilkiebaby11 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 0 | 04-01-2015 08:59 AM |
1993 derek jeter sp and 1994 bowmans best jeter refractor | aclinton1107 | 1980 & Newer Sports Cards B/S/T | 4 | 02-12-2013 02:52 PM |