![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I’ve sent this card to SGC twice, and both times it’s come back as Authentic. The first time, I had inadvertently selected the option to just have it encapsulated and authenticated, because well, I’m an idiot. I sent it back for consideration of a numerical grade, but it still popped as Authentic.
I don’t have a lot of experience with Authentic cards, so I was wondering if this card is so fatally flawed that it would not receive a numerical grade if submitted to PSA. I feel like I’ve seen cards with hole punches, missing pieces, etc, receive 1’s, so I don’t have a good grasp of what constitutes Authentic across the two major grading companies. Thanks in advance for any input! ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Grading Question - help! | oucats02 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 12-13-2017 11:48 AM |
Grading Question | nbenz | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-20-2009 09:30 AM |
E98 Old Put Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-30-2007 02:20 PM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
SGC grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-14-2006 04:31 AM |