![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Whoa...this took a dramatic left turn. I began posting in the March Pickups thread when it suddenly dawned on me that I may have possibly found a brand new, third variation of the 1966 Indians Team card. Here's what I had typed:
"This is a card that flies beneath most people's radar, but it is one of the hardest variations to find for your 1966 set, especially in nicer grade. The Indians Team card missing the pink bullet (dot) on front between "PLACE" and "AMERICAN." I jumped out of my shoes to grab these up quickly..." 1966indiansteam303nodotpairb.jpg But as I was writing it, by looking very closely I could see that even though there is 'nothing' there, the very slightest hint or shadow of a bullet is seemingly present on both of these cards. (The cards themselves were obviously not worked on to nefariously remove anything. There is no indication of that whatsoever.) For comparison, here's a random Indians Team card from ebay to show how bright and obvious said bullet is... s-l1600-5.jpg And here is the pair of variations with a 'normal' Indians Team card beside them that I got from the same person at the same time... ![]() Notice how the colors, brightness, contrast, etc., are all very consistent across the trio of cards. In other words, the bullet didn't 'partially' disappear due to a dearth of magenta ink during the print run. If that was the case, the other reds on the card would have been similarly affected. I've sought out and collected this variation since the 90's, because it is truly hard to find, and have a bunch of them. None of the ones here have the 'shadow' present. I do believe this to be a newfound, third variation of the card!! Check out yours and see if the shadow shows (knows?). (Edited to add a larger version of the comparison pic.)
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 03-09-2020 at 06:08 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hey, Darren, you don't know me. I don't post much any longer, but I wanted to come out of the shadows to say thanks. I sincerely enjoy your posts. The analysis and attention to detail you give the cards of the '60s and '70s is really awesome. You have opened my eyes to the fact that there are still collectors out there who enjoy cards from this era in their natural state and who really get to know their cards, rather than just buying something, sticking it in a box, and moving on to whatever is next. Keep it up. I enjoy reading.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
And what's a variation thread without a progression:
1. No bullet 2. Phantom bullet 3. Full bullet ![]()
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 03-11-2020 at 08:37 PM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and Dots the truth !
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great detective work as usual Darren
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The '73 Kaline Band Aid Variation Train Keeps A-Rollin'... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 28 | 05-16-2019 05:54 PM |
The '69 Airbrush Variation Train Keeps A-Rollin'... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 03-13-2016 11:26 PM |
The '71 Nash Blob Variation Train Keeps A-Rollin'... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 11 | 09-09-2015 05:58 PM |
The '66 Landrum Variation Train Keeps A-Rollin'... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 07-28-2015 07:02 PM |
WTB: Cleveland Indians Team Issues | Seiklis | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-18-2012 02:56 PM |