![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Was thinking about some of the nice players being in the T207 set that don't appear in others... Hooper, Wood, etc. and thought how much more fanfare the set would have if it included just one or two other superstars. I imagine the Cobb looking something like the bat on shoulder 06 version and maybe the Jackson as a side action pose (maybe like the 07 Bescher). If you combine those two cards with a redone WaJo and remove a few of the undesirables, like Konetchy, I think many would think of it as being right up there with the other tobacco sets and some would even put it on the top of the list. I know that would be asking a whole lot out of one set but what are your guys thoughts? Can you think of any other sets where a similar argument could be made?
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting concept, but I think the colors of T206 would keep it far ahead of the pack.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting thought Tyler. Although I don't think adding Cobb and Jackson would propel T207 to a higher level than T206. The monster has three very iconic cards in Wagner, Plank and Magie, plus four Cobbs and 524 total cards. T207 couldn't beat that if it had Cobb, Jackson and Wagner. Just my thoughts at the moment. Looking forward to hearing other's thoughts as well.
__________________
I'm always looking for t206's with purple numbers stamped on the back like the one in my avatar. The Great T206 Back Stamp Project: Click Here My Online Trading Site: Click Here Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com My Humble Blog: Click Here |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe I'm just not a fan of T207, but I can't imagine anything you could do to the player selection to bring it anywhere in the league of T206. And I am not even a T206 groupie.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
T205 has the best design. T206 has the best player selection. You would need to add a lot more than Cobb and Jackson to t207 to compete with either of those. You are still missing Matty, Young, Collins, etc. plus the WaJo looks nothing like him and the design isn't colorful.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Look at the T206 pitching version.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I doubt it ... and I say that as a big T207 fan. The missing players are just part of the pie. Despite the fact that I love the look of them, that's really the biggest reason why most people can't get into them.
Cobb and Matty would have helped. Jackson would have helped, too, given he wasn't in the others. But in the end, I still think you'd just have people more interested in pursuing those individual cards just for the players themselves than actually enjoying the set. It's not for everyone and I think that has a lot more to do with the design than the checklist.
__________________
T205 (208/208) T206 (520/520) T207 (200/200) E90-1 (120/121) E91A/B/C (99/99) 1895 Mayo (16/48) N28/N29 Allen & Ginter (100/100) N162 Goodwin Champions (30/50) N184 Kimball Champions (37/50) Complete: E47, E49, E50, E75, E76, E229, N88, N91, R136, T29, T30, T38, T51, T53, T68, T73, T77, T118, T218, T220, T225 www.prewarcollector.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would help but still not topping t3 in appearance or t206 in collectability.
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Add Ruth and Gehrig to the Diamond Stars set, and I think it draws a lot closer to 1933 Goudey.
__________________
. Buying T205s: (larger want list here) • Also WTB: Christy Mathewson - 1914 Pritchard Stamp See the Want List for "Successful net54 transactions" list. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
babe ruth to CJ...end of story!
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
4 Ruths in Goudey, it's still not close.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Originally Posted by gonzo
Add Ruth and Gehrig to the Diamond Stars set, and I think it draws a lot closer to 1933 Goudey. 4 Ruths in Goudey, it's still not close. I think if Diamond Stars had both Ruth and Gehrig, it would top the 1934 Goudey set in demand, but still would lag behind the 1933 Goudey in popularity, just because of 1933's larger set size and overall classic art, versus the Diamond Stars acquired taste Art Deco stylings. Brian |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the T207s, though I'm a fan of Bela Lugosi movies.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ty Cobb not the monster many have made him out to be? | sportscardtheory | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 82 | 04-12-2017 06:03 AM |
WTB: 14/15 CJ Joe Jackson OR Cobb | sportscardpete | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 07-08-2013 07:26 AM |
Cobb-Jackson postcard value? | RichardSimon | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 7 | 01-26-2013 10:20 AM |
WTB Joe Jackson & Cobb's | sycks22 | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 04-17-2011 10:07 PM |
Tough T207 - Hank Butcher (back mentions Joe Jackson) PRICE REDUCED | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 03-25-2009 09:03 AM |