![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Aesthetically speaking I prefer.... | |||
The PSA 7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
32 | 43.24% |
The one in the row of 4 (it is an SGC 60, btw) |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 32.43% |
Both about the same...... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
18 | 24.32% |
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let's say the values are exactly the same. Which do you prefer, the PSA 7 or the one in the row of 4, on the far right? (It resides in an SGC60 holder now.)
This is purely aesthetically speaking? (I was thinking of maybe upgrading....)
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 08-21-2014 at 10:44 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I voted for the PSA 7. My untrained eyes are telling me the corners look a little sharper
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The corners are sharper on the PSA graded card, but I'm not sure what is going on in the lower right border. Is that a chip, or just a something in/on the holder?
If the imperfection is on the card I would stick with the ungraded card. Both look very nice to me. Best regards, Joe |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
it'd be better for analysis if the scans were the same size. based on what you have given us...I prefer the psa 7...the colors appear more vivid...and the overall card is more appealing...to me!
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I don't care much about corners on 100 year-old cards, so my opinion might not be relevant to you. I prefer the SGC example for the reason Joe mentioned, and it seems that the colors are a bit deeper/smoother.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They look about the same to me, so no real reason to "upgrade". Both are very nice cards - I'd be happy to own either one.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The PSA 7 looks a tad sharper and has a bit more pop but that may be due to the difference in scan quality. I would be delighted with either one - both are beautiful exemplars of a highly sought after card.
Link to my Kreindler Last edited by Kawika; 08-21-2014 at 11:13 AM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with Chris...the corners are what made the separation for me. Both very nice tho
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They are both pretty close but I would go for the 7 also it just has a bit more " pop " .
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
They are both nice cards, assuming the backs are equally clean I'd save my money and upgrade the black printed back Moran!
![]()
__________________
Check out my YouTube Videos highlighting VINTAGE CARDS https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbE..._as=subscriber ebay store: kryvintage-->https://www.ebay.com/sch/kryvintage/...p2047675.l2562 |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think I prefer the SGC 60. The possible chip on the lower right of the PSA card knocks it down for me. The PSA card also looks like it has a faint stain in the middle of the right side. The color on the SGC might be slightly inferior, but it is still really good and the card is clean with solid edges.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For an investment scenario, PSA 7.
For a collector scenario, the SGC graded card.
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The Closer I Look at Each Example... The More I Like the SGC 60! If that is a Chip, As Bryan So Keenly Pointed Out! Than the "PSA 7, Isn't a 7!" However, David's Example has Totally Ruined my Focus... So, I'm Now Thinkin'... It might be in Your Best Interest to See What David'll take fir that Masterpiece! ![]()
__________________
Life's Grand, Denny Walsh Last edited by irishdenny; 08-21-2014 at 01:03 PM. Reason: Exponding oN Bryan's Observation... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The SGC 60 has better centering; on the PSA 7 the right border is wider than the left. But because I feel cards with huge borders are desirable, and due to the sharper corners, I lean a little more towards the PSA 7. Kind of close to call, however.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I just don't see enough of an upgrade to spend the extra money. So I would take the SGC example. Both are great cards.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I prefer the 7 but Im also a sucker for the 300 series!
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Why do they label Woods' cards Smoky Joe but they won't label Jackson's cards Shoeless Joe??
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for asking. Please mail to....
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
M116 Joe Wood - PSA 7 | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 2 | 05-24-2007 10:24 AM |
1911 M116 Sporting Life JOE WOOD PSA 6 LOOKING FOR A HOME | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 12-23-2006 07:09 PM |
Down to 2 cards in M116 Sporting Life Anyone have a Wagner pastel and/or Wood? | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 12-22-2006 09:30 PM |
Why is the Smoky Joe Wood M116 so in demand.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-09-2006 08:47 PM |
Looking for M116 Sporting Life Coveleskie, Wood | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 3 | 04-29-2006 10:00 PM |