![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This card has always puzzled me. Side to side, it measures nearly one and a half inches, which is wider than most t206s. On inspection, it doesn't appear to have been cut from a sheet. It seems I have read a thread which debunked the notion that American Beauties were cut smaller to fit in a smaller pack, if that were true then this one would not have fit in that pack. Then again, this card may have accidently been inserted into a different brand of tobacco. I would love to see other large bordered American Beauties that board members might have.
Edit. Actually, after looking at the preview (large scan) of this post, it does appear to have an irregular cut.
__________________
http://ImageEvent.com/nealfamily Last edited by martin neal; 02-07-2011 at 11:07 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The majority of them are narrower, but not all. It may be that the first batch were designed to be cut normal, then later they altered the process. ???
Does anyone know if they altered the sheets to make the side borders narrower, or did they just cut a sliver off of each card to make them narrower? Here are 2 more Lake scans to compare... 350 & 460 (the 350 later graded SGC-50) ![]() ![]() Last edited by fkw; 02-07-2011 at 11:25 AM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin, that's a great card! Thanks for posting. Frank, if you have no room for those 2 Lake cards as you move, I'm happy to keep an eye on 'em here in Kentucky.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin,
Sweet card ![]() i wish i could examine it... this is odd, because there are no definite clues(missing color/severe registration, etc,ect) to indicate any sign of scrap except those wavy side borders...i have never found a wide bordered am. beauty before......i'm sure Ted will eleborate since he has been all over am. beauties in the past... TED , WHERE ARE YOU ![]() BTW can't thank you enough for the matty scrap Martin!!! YOU ROCK!! ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here is one of my AB's (non framed back) - I would call this a wide bordered AB as my other one (with framed back) is much narrower. Really looks "normal" like other T206's
Last edited by OldSchoolBaseball; 02-07-2011 at 02:02 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Martin,
That is a great card. It looks to me to have been hand cut on the sides. My guess is it never saw the inside of a cigarette pack. JimB |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice Iron Man collection Pete.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
As for the American Beauty pack "myth", I've owned (and still own) American Beauty cigarette boxes from a few different years, including 1905, 1909 and 1910. I can unequivocally say that all of the boxes I have ever owned were not any narrower than the other brands unsed to distribute T206 cards (i.e., Sweet Caporal, Piedmont, Old Mill, Sovereign, etc).
__________________
For information on baseball-related cigarette and tobacco packs, visit www.baseballandtobacco.com. Instagram: @vintage_cigarette_packs |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Nice cards everyone, and thanks Jon, I thought that "myth" was incorrect.
__________________
http://ImageEvent.com/nealfamily |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A couple side-by-side for comparison.
Leifield and Miller both look relatively normal, width-wise. ![]() ![]() While these 460 Subjects seem to be of the narrower persuasion ![]() ![]() |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wonder if the AB sizing has to do with the particular series. 350 vs 460. bordered or not.
Here's a link to a recent thread that tangented onto this topic. http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=131752 Within is also a link to a prior Net54 thread further delving into the reason ABs may or may not have been cut thin. Thanks, --S
__________________
collecting T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, and 1952 Bowman. e-mails preferred over PM. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
.
![]()
__________________
T206Resource.com Last edited by cfc1909; 02-08-2011 at 10:13 PM. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]()
__________________
T206Resource.com |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's 2 sample packs I have. One is a thinner size, designed to hold 15 cigarettes. The 10-count pack has been shown to have contained T206's in 1909-1910, due to some American Tobacco Company packing sheets that were found. To date, no similar sheets have been found for 15-count packs which I believe were first introduced in 1910 when the tax rate changed.
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It seems like a lot of the American Beauty T206's have one side of the white border chopped off.
Has anyone ever opened a sealed AB pack that had a card in it? Also- Martin, that is an awesome card you have !! Sincerely, Clayton Edit to add.... If the theory about the thinner pack is not correct, could it be as simple as a loyal smoker of American Beauty cigs for some reason or other saved his/her cards, and for whatever reason trimmed off either side of the white border? Just a thought. Last edited by teetwoohsix; 02-09-2011 at 11:06 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FYI....T206 AMERICAN BEAUTY 350 fr..350 nofr..460 confirmed lists | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 43 | 02-10-2016 09:33 AM |
Another T206 Matching Set...American Beauty 350 (No Frame) and Drum | Abravefan11 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-21-2010 11:30 PM |
New theory why American Beauty cards are narrower than other T206's | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 04-05-2010 09:16 PM |
WANTED T206 Eddie Collins w/ American Beauty or Cycle back | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 03-04-2009 06:13 PM |
American Beauty T205 to short | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 10-14-2006 10:31 AM |