Hooker t209

[cfc1909]

can anyone show me a scan of t209 Hooker?

thanks
Jim

[sgbernard]

Jim, this isn't mine, but I have a pictures database. Don't know who actually owns it.

Gotta say, that's not the most attractive hooker.

[cfc1909]

Thanks Seth

I was just wondering if the picture matched the T210,e222,t206-not.

I think I will still try and find one.

[sgbernard]

Baseballreference has a couple of Hookers from this period, but Buck Hooker (the T206 subject) is the only one with much attachment to the southern leagues--he was born in VA. He played a bitter of major league ball with Cincinnati before bouncing around the southern leagues, and if I'm not mistaken, he's one of the few fellows to appear as both a T206 and a T209. The familiarity between the card I showed and this T206 (also not mine, sorry!) is there. Perhaps someone more knowledgeable can weigh in?

[bbcard1]

I googled "Hooker" and got a lot of results, just not the one you are looking for.

[Brian Weisner]

Hi Seth,
That "Hooker" may not be pretty... but it's mine...

Be well Brian


PS Hi Jim....

[sgbernard]

Hey Brian, hope you're well: bad year for the 'Heels, I can hardly watch!

I never knew I'd catch you with a Hooker!

You know, since the T210, the E222, and the T206 all share the same portrait but with the uniform manipulated, might this suggest that the T210 and the T209 (Both Danville) date to the same time, and that the T206 and the E222 (Both Lynchburg) date to the same time? Probably with one pair in 1909, the other pair in 1910?