 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
08-31-2009, 08:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
1933 Goudey Gehrig Memorex or Real?
Did any of the rank and file run accross this '33 Goudey Gehrig auction yesterday? The seller is a long-time Net54 member who doesn't seem to post that often anymore. This has got to be one of the greatest fears of those who resubmit a card in hopes of a better grade. Ouch! Cracking-out this card and then sending it raw obviously cost the seller $$$. In this case (and with hindsight), he would have probably been better served resubmiting it in the holder.
So, please enlighten me, does the card look legit? And has this ever happened to anybody else, either with a card or a date  ......?http://cgi.ebay.com/1933-Goudey-92-L...mZ330355966486 Lovley Day... Last edited by iggyman; 08-31-2009 at 08:47 AM. 
|
|
#2
08-31-2009, 08:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow. Interesting. Perfect feedback from an experienced collector.
If it was real, seems like he would know that resubmitting at least once more would be WELL worth his time over selling raw. Unless he knows it's fake.
|
|
#4
08-31-2009, 11:11 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was watching that and just didn't make sense to give away a card like that so I didn't even bid. If real could've taken to a show and traded for some great stuff or sold it, and why not resubmit again. Of course it is possible that PSA originally made a mistake the first time and seller then realized it was probably a fake so just dumped it for as much as possible. My only issue is if it is a fake, someone just got the original slip so can easily reslab and sell as a 5 o/c and make a quick 700-1000 easy and rip someone off, not cool.
|
|
#5
09-04-2009, 06:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
The card is a reprint. The bottom red strip should not match up perfectly at the ends (same exact width) as the blue background. Also the bat should extend more into the border at top. The overall color is way too dark compared to the too white borders. Look at the eyes and face.... way too dark!
#92 below 
|
|
#7
09-04-2009, 08:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Leaving authenticity aside the original grade makes no sense that is not o/c for a 5. And look at the back, the bleed appears to me to be right against one edge whereas it is not on the front.
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 U.S. Caramel Scarcity VS 1933 Goudey etc | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-20-2009 08:32 PM |
| For Sale: 1933 Goudey Lou Gehrig # 160 SGC 86 | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-03-2008 06:41 PM |
| 1933 Goudey #92 Gehrig Appears VG+ SOLD | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-23-2008 09:13 PM |
| 1933 Goudey Gehrig #92 Wanted | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-17-2005 07:00 AM |
| Wanted- 1933 Goudey Gehrig | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-11-2005 09:27 AM |
Hybrid Mode
