|
|
View Poll Results: Is it ethical to alter and sell cards without disclosing that they were altered? | |||
Yes, it is perfectly acceptable and ethical to sell an altered without disclosing this to the buyer | 5 | 4.24% | |
No, it is unethical to not disclose alterations the alterations | 34 | 28.81% | |
No, it is unethical to not disclose the alterations, and it is fraud to do so | 79 | 66.95% | |
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fair enough. In Brian's Bob Ewing example above, can we stipulate that the mustache doesn't have to be disclosed if we call it "natural growth?" And removing the mustache again is fine as long as it's "shaving" and not "erasing?"
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Brian |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ethical to sell 1952 Mantle PSA 8 uncracked case | 1952boyntoncollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 96 | 02-23-2015 11:04 AM |
So much for REA disclosure on T206s... | CMIZ5290 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 82 | 04-30-2014 12:44 PM |
Photo cleaning disclosure | 71buc | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 12-18-2012 08:40 AM |
B&L Auction Disclosure | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 77 | 05-21-2008 09:08 PM |
disclosure issues | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-31-2007 06:45 PM |