Gun ownership poll

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by BCauley

I’m curious if you went back and read this, after typing it out, and then hit submit.

I was pointing to the fact in was praying on unsophisticated girls.... its always the people that are looking to troll on an issue that you wonder is it themselves that have the same issue.. ( not saying you, just generally)...

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

I was pointing to the fact in was praying on unsophisticated girls.... its always the people that are looking to troll on an issue that you wonder is it themselves that have the same issue.. ( not saying you, just generally)...

Predators often choose their prey based on what they think they can get away with. Did you expect to find that he had been raping all his ultra-wealthy friends' children instead?

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry

Predators often choose their prey based on what they think they can get away with. Did you expect to find that he had been raping all his ultra-wealthy friends' children instead?

well there is a lot of space between 'utlra-wealthy' friends children..



so all predators only pray on the same people that he got away with..i think not...

your comment seems to imply that victims are either from high schools with lesser means that are recruited or children from ultra wealthy friends. I beg to differ


I do believe people that pray on the vulnerable are the biggest criminals out there and should do more time or just as much time as the worst of the worst criminals.....

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

For the amount of money he had i am surprised of the girls he picked...sort of a fast food option has Heidi Fleiss put it with Robert Kraft and the day spa...

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

I was pointing to the fact in was praying on unsophisticated girls....

I was responding specifically to these two comments of yours. I'm not sure why you would refer to child victims of a sexual predator as "fast food options" but to your claim that they were "unsophisticated" I am saying that Epstein would have been less successful in committing his crimes had he been targeting the children of more privileged people (more "sophisticated"). I suppose there is a chance that by "unsophisticated" you simply meant "young"–if so, that's a really weird way of making the point.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry

I was responding specifically to these two comments of yours. I'm not sure why you would refer to child victims of a sexual predator as "fast food options" but to your claim that they were "unsophisticated" I am saying that Epstein would have been less successful in committing his crimes had he been targeting the children of more privileged people (more "sophisticated"). I suppose there is a chance that by "unsophisticated" you simply meant "young"–if so, that's a really weird way of making the point.

well child high schoolers was the point I was making of being unsophisticated versus adults, say in their 20s...

Again you give a non answer. Saying Epstein would of been less successful against 'sophisticated' kids of wealth people, does not seem to include a LOT of woman in between those genres in which he would also be super successful...he was promising victorias secret access i believe which people older than high school age could have easily been fallen pray

Weinstein was pretty successful with woman older than kids in high school who i will go out on a limb and say they were more 'sophisticated'...that the girls that were with epstien..

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry

I was responding specifically to these two comments of yours. I'm not sure why you would refer to child victims of a sexual predator as "fast food options" but to your claim that they were "unsophisticated" I am saying that Epstein would have been less successful in committing his crimes had he been targeting the children of more privileged people (more "sophisticated"). I suppose there is a chance that by "unsophisticated" you simply meant "young"–if so, that's a really weird way of making the point.

well child high schoolers was the point I was making of being unsophisticated versus adults, say in their 20s...

Again you give a non answer. Saying Epstein would of been less successful against 'sophisticated' kids of wealth people, does not seem to include a LOT of woman in between those genres in which he would also be super successful...he was promising victorias secret access i believe which people older than high school age could have easily been fallen pray....you also ignore my post in which to Epstien he considered the girls the FF option.

Weinstein was pretty successful with woman older than kids in high school who i will go out on a limb and say they were more 'sophisticated'...then the girls that were with epstein

we can all agree it was a terrible outrage..not sure why you direct posts to me on this....perhaps you may want to move on..

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

well child high schoolers was the point I was making of being unsophisticated versus adults, say in their 20s...

Again you give a non answer. Saying Epstein would of been less successful against 'sophisticated' kids of wealth people, does not seem to include a LOT of woman in between those genres in which he would also be super successful...he was promising victorias secret access i believe which people older than high school age could have easily been fallen pray

Weinstein was pretty successful with woman older than kids in high school who i will go out on a limb and say they were more 'sophisticated'...then the girls that were with epstein

we can all agree it was a terrible outrage..not sure why you direct posts to me on this....perhaps you may want to move on..

So, it surprised you that a pedophile chose to prey on children? Weinstein isn't a pedophile as far I know. To your second paragraph, if your point is that my statement doesn't include a thing that it wasn't meant to include, you are absolutely correct.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by BobbyStrawberry

So, it surprised you that a pedophile chose to prey on children? Weinstein isn't a pedophile as far I know. To your second paragraph, if your point is that my statement doesn't include a thing that it wasn't meant to include, you are absolutely correct.

it didnt surprise me actually he would pray on children....i thought weinstein had victims as well. to show you that you can be a victim without being a child... i guess you feel that if you are not a child you cant be a victim....my point was you can have victims far less than kids or young people of wealthy parents ..not just high schoolers.

however Weinstein was with at least one underage girl allegedly that was 16 years old so if true, plus who knows who else we dont know about, but that would be considered pedophile behavior i would submit,

this is a gun ownership thread..maybe you may want to direct to your responses about the thread......

Epstien was with girls that were over 18...so was Weinstein..not sure why you are trying to make a difference...we can all agree both of their behaviors were terribly bad..

[G1911]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

I was pointing to the fact in was praying on unsophisticated girls.... its always the people that are looking to troll on an issue that you wonder is it themselves that have the same issue.. ( not saying you, just generally)...

Let’s be clear. You are accusing people, in general, who think your comment about the victims being the ‘fast food’ option for abuse was bizarre, of possibly being pedophiles? Because that is what you have written here.

Are you in your right mind?

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by G1911

Let’s be clear. You are accusing people, in general, who think your comment about the victims being the ‘fast food’ option for abuse was bizarre, of possibly being pedophiles? Because that is what you have written here.

Are you in your right mind?

Funny when people say lets be clear, they then say something that isnt clear..

i am saying that TO the predator, they were 'fast food' options (someone that can be delivered quickly for cheap and other people used that terms before which i just requoted) someone opined they were easier targets than well off people......your 'outrage' is misplaced but its common these days on the boards to have lots of 'outrage'

[G1911]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

Funny when people say lets be clear, they then say something that isnt clear..

Considering that you seem to struggle with writing in the English language and do not understand how capital letters, sentence structure, or periods work, this is an odd point to try and make.

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

i am saying that TO the predator, they were 'fast food' options (someone that can be delivered quickly for cheap and other people used that terms before which i just requoted) someone opined they were easier targets than well off people......your 'outrage' is misplaced but its common these days on the boards to have lots of 'outrage'

This is a complete, outright lie. You did not say that TO the predator. What you said was, in post 1024 and as I quoted in post 1026: "its always the people that are looking to troll on an issue that you wonder is it themselves that have the same issue.. ( not saying you, just generally)..."

That is not a statement TO Epstein. Epstein wasn't 'trolling' on the issue, nor is he plural. You are explicitly addressing the people here, the 'trolls', by which you seem to mean the people who think your post is bizarre at best, might themselves "have the same issue", which is obviously being a pedophile. At least have the guts to own it if you're crazy enough to claim it.

What is wrong with you? I've seen a lot of stupid shit on Net54 (just like everywhere in the world), from the low effort scammers to the guy who was virtue signaling about how people shouldn't post pictures of Cap Anson while using a picture of Cap Anson as his avatar, but saying that most people here (nobody seems to think your fast food comment or joke is appropriate, tasteful or possibly sensical, thank God) might be pedophiles for that takes the cake. Are you insane or just off your meds this week?

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by G1911

Considering that you seem to struggle with writing in the English language and do not understand how capital letters, sentence structure, or periods work, this is an odd point to try and make.



This is a complete, outright lie. You did not say that TO the predator. What you said was, in post 1024 and as I quoted in post 1026: "its always the people that are looking to troll on an issue that you wonder is it themselves that have the same issue.. ( not saying you, just generally)..."

That is not a statement TO Epstein. Epstein wasn't 'trolling' on the issue, nor is he plural. You are explicitly addressing the people here, the 'trolls', by which you seem to mean the people who think your post is bizarre at best, might themselves "have the same issue", which is obviously being a pedophile. At least have the guts to own it if you're crazy enough to claim it.

What is wrong with you? I've seen a lot of stupid shit on Net54 (just like everywhere in the world), from the low effort scammers to the guy who was virtue signaling about how people shouldn't post pictures of Cap Anson while using a picture of Cap Anson as his avatar, but saying that most people here (nobody seems to think your fast food comment or joke is appropriate, tasteful or possibly sensical, thank God) might be pedophiles for that takes the cake. Are you insane or just off your meds this week?

what is wrong with you.. when i see you attack the poster and not debate the message we all know you are just a trolling....nobody wants a troller...

you also misidentify and spin almost everything i said as well.....i .ive seen some crazy posts as well.....all this fake outrage as well...i continue to advise of the bad actions of these eptsien, wienstien and lets add R. Kelly over and over and all you do is attack the poster. All I keep saying is how terrible these people are and you are calling me insane... so its insane for me to say Weinstein is a sick and terrible person. Please stop lieing and mischaracterizing my posts...Yes I said to Mr. Epstein he looked at the victims as FF options (thats what my intent was that was explained)...and i also said he was a terrible person and should be in jail as long as any of the worst criminals in the world , dont hear you comment a peep on that.. You took the liberty to say i am calling people on the board pedis, when i said 'generally' and was not implying anyone on the these boards AND was not referring to just pedis, was referring to all things as i said AN ISSUE, (example, some people see too much violence in all matters in life, but they themselves have a violence issue )I thought you were the grammar king as i did not say THIS issue.........just a crazy narrative...

facts do not care about your feelings...


this is a gun ownership thread...i am just responding to personal attacks, i am not the one initiating them..

[G1911]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

what is wrong with you.. when i see you attack the poster and not debate the message we all know you are just a trolling....nobody wants a troller...

you also misidentify and spin almost everything i said as well.....i .ive seen some crazy posts as well.....all this fake outrage as well...i continue to advise of the bad actions of these eptsien, wienstien and lets add R. Kelly over and over and all you do is attack the poster. All I keep saying is how terrible these people are and you are calling me insane... so its insane for me to say Weinstein is a sick and terrible person. Please stop lieing and mischaracterizing my posts...Yes I said to Mr. Epstein he looked at the victims as FF options (thats what my intent was that was explained)...and i also said he was a terrible person and should be in jail as long as any of the worst criminals in the world , dont hear you comment a peep on that.. You took the liberty to say i am calling people on the board pedis, when i said 'generally' and was not implying anyone on the these boards AND was not referring to just pedis, was referring to all things as i said AN ISSUE, (example, some people see too much violence in all matters in life, but they themselves have a violence issue )I thought you were the grammar king as i did not say THIS issue.........just a crazy narrative...

facts do not care about your feelings...


this is a gun ownership thread...i am just responding to personal attacks, i am not the one initiating them..

You are definitely unhinged. There's no spin, just your outright lunacy and bizarre pedo claims on open display. Get help.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by G1911

You are definitely unhinged. There's no spin, just your outright lunacy and bizarre pedo claims on open display. Get help.

Everyone can read and make their own decisions..not sure why you continue to banter back and forth, nobody else cares..but you right i am luny to go back and forth with you on this thread. Perhaps you will make another personal attack but is what it is.... we both like cards so does everyone else...maybe you want to put an end to it or make another post which many would deem luny at this point...

[BCauley]

Originally Posted by 1952boyntoncollector

I was pointing to the fact in was praying on unsophisticated girls.... its always the people that are looking to troll on an issue that you wonder is it themselves that have the same issue.. ( not saying you, just generally)...

Yeah. You’re not helping yourself with this comment either.

[1952boyntoncollector]

Originally Posted by BCauley

Yeah. You’re not helping yourself with this comment either.

hmm its not my first time around the block on this forum..i dont think anyone really cares at this point..this is a gun ownership poll thread......you are not helping yourself either..