|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Huh?
Goodwin currently has a series 4 T210 of Collier PSA 1.5 which is advertised as not only the lone graded copy but there are no known ungraded copies known to exist.
Interesting since I have an SGC 30 T210-4 Collier |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Most auction house employ the "in the neighborhood" rule when it comes to descriptions.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Must be 3
I also saw the "one of a kind" T210-4 Collier card in the current Goodwin auction, and thought to myself "I think I have a Collier, too." I checked, and was right - I do. It is ungraded, so how else would anyone know?
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I disagree with Barry's point
To me the population of SGC when dealing with PSA is irrelevant in my opinion, and vice versa. If they had the same standards and caught all the same alterations I would agree, but they do not.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
"The only one graded in the hobby" seems to have become the latest "buzz" phrase to attract crazy bidding activity...esp on front/back t206 combinations...it seems to work...atleast for Goodwin!
The whales like to have their ego's stroked...often! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Glyn- but what if you are buying the PSA 8 because you believe it's the finest known? It's not the finest if there's a better one out there. At least the cataloguer should mention the presence of what is likely the better card.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Sorry - I am with Glyn on this one. You have to keep the pop reports of the different companies separate. If you start cross comparing, then you have to also include GAI, BVG, KSA, PRO, etc. Just gets to be too much.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
If you start cross comparing, who is going to be the judge of the companies that you do and don't include on the comparison. Someone can include both SGC and PSA, but then by omitting the one BVG card that ranks higher than both of the first two companies, that is misleading also. Then if you include BVG as well, the KSA owner says, "Well, what about MY 1 of 1 KSA 10!?!?!". Just gets to be too much. I see nothing wrong with sticking to the single companies pop report. When you start crossing companies report like that though, I just don't get it.
|
|
|