|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree that the concept was a fish out of water.
Many of those of us who collected the originals found the down-sized glossy cards jarring. And the "extended" cards in 1953 were butt-ugly. Younger collectors, by and large, couldn't have cared less about guys like Angel Scull and Bobby Young.
__________________
My (usually) vintage baseball/football card blog: http://boblemke.blogspot.com Link to my custom cards gallery: http://tinyurl.com/customcards |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Which is one advantage of the Topps Heritage line - the older designs with current players that the younger fans can relate to. It's just a shame Topps couldn't have waited a year to begin the series, because then they'd be able to market them as today's players in card designs from 50 years ago (the 2012 Heritage set uses the design from the 1963 Topps).
__________________
The GIF of me making the gesture seen 'round the world has been viewed over 444 million times! ![]() If only I had one cent-- make it half a cent-- for each view... 😭 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
The other issue was the archive set also were created during the hobby boom. After 1994, sales of cards started to dry up and the archives set were not only as Bob said, a bit aggravating to get all the players involved but also were not going to sell enough copies to make the project worthwhile.
That is why Topps tried the Dodgers archives in 1995 and that ended the sets until the heritage sets began in 2001 Regards Rich Last edited by Rich Klein; 05-25-2012 at 08:28 PM. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"fish out of water" ? I must be swimming upstream , again, because I really love the complete reprint sets. And Topp's were by far the best. As far a players from eras before ones time-- as a set builder, I've always found the commons to be as interesting and more fun than the star cards. For the younger collector, is there more interest in a common player from the fifties, if the card is an original?
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
John--Better a fish out of water than butt ugly
![]() Al Last edited by ALR-bishop; 05-16-2012 at 04:07 PM. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Al, you did manage to put it in perspective for me.
As for the legendary Bob Lemke, not seeeing how a younger generation collector could have interest in the Angel Scull card? Why I'm stunned. If that three panel cartoon on the card back, on how he was doing well on the field (destined to be a AAAA player,) but didn't understand any English until a Spanish speaking women introduced him to some college students to help teach him, isn't inspirational to the younger collector, I'm in the wrong hobby. *edited to insert smilie face and change the tone* Last edited by theseeker; 05-16-2012 at 04:43 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I saw Angel Scull play ball & met him in 1951. He lived in an apt right across the street from my grandparents!
__________________
I've learned that I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy it. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1954 Topps Archives Don Liddle Auto Card SOLD | rp12367 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-31-2012 07:20 PM |
| LARGE List of Autographed Cards All Sports (1940s-2000s) | canjond | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 06-28-2010 01:38 PM |
| FS/FT 1971 Topps FB SGC Lot of 111 !!! Offers Please. | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 0 | 03-31-2009 09:12 PM |
| UPDATED 1970-1980 BASEBALL SINGLES FS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-04-2008 11:12 AM |
| UPDATED 1951-1969 BASEBALL SINGLES FS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-04-2008 11:12 AM |