![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So goudey onll has 2 printings? One for the 33s and other for the 34s which included the lajoie?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 1933 GOUDEY set comprises of 239 cards which were printed on ten 24-card sheets. The #144 Babe Ruth card was Double-Printed.
There was NO card of Lajoie available in 1933. In the Summer of 1934, GOUDEY printed the Lajoie (#106) card on their High # series sheet (as shown here). Collectors of 1933 Goudey cards could write a letter to GOUDEY (Boston, Mass) and request this Lajoie card. 1934 GOUDEY High # series sheet (includes Lajoie) ![]() TED Z Last edited by tedzan; 05-09-2012 at 05:22 AM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Does anyone know if the 1934 Goudey high numbered sheet was printed WITHOUT the Lajoie? If so, was it a 6 x 4 configuration, or perhaps was one of the cards double printed? And has anyone noted any of the 1934 high numbers to be more readily available?
Brian ? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 96 card set would suggest four 24 card sheets. If they were printed in sheets of 25, then there are three double prints. Does anybody know which cards they are?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The first 72 cards of the 1934 GOUDEY set were printed on 24-card sheets. To change the Hi # card's sheet to a 25-card format to include Lajoie must of been quite a modification for Goudey. Best regards, TED Z |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
It's my experience that the 12 lower Hi #'s with the "Chuck Klein says" comments (on bottom of each card) are somewhat tougher to find than the 12 upper Hi #'s with "Lou Gehrig says". ![]() TED Z |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Ted, that's interesting. To have to change the size and format of the sheets in midstream is quite an undertaking.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe not such a major change in in Goudey's format sheet format.
Because their 1936 BB set consists of 25 cards. I cannot speak for the 1935 BB set, as you know, it is too complex with all its front / back permutations. TED Z |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have 2 sets as well and completely agree about the Chuck Klein says cards...
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A question...does this mean that the only known complete sheets of the 1934 Goudey high numbers contain the Lajoie, or are there any out there without Lajoie? I always assumed that Goudey did a special, limited printing run with the Lajoie. If it was a full production run with the Lajoie on every sheet, wouldn't it have been a nightmare/incredibly impractical to sort out the Lajoie cards after they had been cut?
Brian Last edited by brianp-beme; 05-09-2012 at 03:57 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1934 Goudey Question??? | iggyman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 12-03-2009 05:08 PM |
1948 Bowman Uncut Sheet Berra, Musial, Spahn.. MORE PICTURES | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 11-18-2008 08:42 AM |
Memory Lane Redux? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 162 | 04-18-2007 05:51 PM |
Slightly OT: Uncut Helmar Proof Sheet with Color Separations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-17-2006 03:15 PM |
How many E93 uncut sheet out there? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-01-2006 03:55 PM |