Help solve the great baseball mystery

[whitehse]

Nope they wouldnt throw them out due to the cost involved with buying the baseballs. It all depends on how many were left in the inventory. I would assume if just a few dozen were left they would either use them in game situations or just use them for batting practice, but throwing them out surely did not happen.

[cardsfan22]

I have discovered in the last few days that while Giamatti died in 1989 he did become the overall baseball commissioner before the 1989 season and therefore Bill White was president of the National League the entire 1989 and 1990 season. So while i think it is possible that some Giamatti balls were used in 1989 doesnt it seem a lot less likely they would carry over all the way to mid 1990?

[Splinte1941]

Originally Posted by cardsfan22

I have discovered in the last few days that while Giamatti died in 1989 he did become the overall baseball commissioner before the 1989 season and therefore Bill White was president of the National League the entire 1989 and 1990 season. So while i think it is possible that some Giamatti balls were used in 1989 doesnt it seem a lot less likely they would carry over all the way to mid 1990?

Unfortunately, I think you've solved the mystery. I say unfortunately, because the ball is probably not legitimate based on this information. Clark wouldn't be smart enough to know to check the label on the ball before passing it off as his 300th, a mistake most players would make, especially those looking to make a quick buck or two.

If Bill White is the NL president from the start of the 1989 season, then there might be some '88 Giamatti balls floating around in the first half of the '89 season, but much less likely in mid 1990. Doesn't pass the smell test to me, but again, I hope I'm wrong.

[Jayworld]

Jack Clark lived in McKinney, Texas, in 2007 and 2008 (I used to work with his daughter), and he now lives in Plano, Texas, which is just 15 miles north of Dallas.

[thecatspajamas]

Brandon, correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't the balls produced for each season based on who was the league president at the beginning of the year, not the beginning of the season, and therefore 1989 ONL balls would bear Giamatti's name, not Bill White's (since Giamatti was still NL president on January 1, and named Commissioner on April 1).

To my mind, this would seem to be a reasonable assumption since there has to be some lead time to the production of the thousands of balls that would be used in games starting in early April. You can't name a new NL president on April 1, and then 2 days later on Opening Day have a truckload of balls show up ready for game use.

[cardsfan22]

Originally Posted by thecatspajamas

Brandon, correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't the balls produced for each season based on who was the league president at the beginning of the year, not the beginning of the season, and therefore 1989 ONL balls would bear Giamatti's name, not Bill White's (since Giamatti was still NL president on January 1, and named Commissioner on April 1).

To my mind, this would seem to be a reasonable assumption since there has to be some lead time to the production of the thousands of balls that would be used in games starting in early April. You can't name a new NL president on April 1, and then 2 days later on Opening Day have a truckload of balls show up ready for game use.

It is amazing where all this research leads and how interesting this is all becoming (to me at least ha). I have been emailing with Big League Baseballs and one thing they sent me was this article:

http://news.google.com/newspapers?id...me+balls&hl=en

In the article it address the issue that was just brought up about producing the balls with the White signature. Basically it looks like Rawlings was trying to get all the teams the new balls by opening day 1989 but they acknowledged Giamatti balls would prob still make it into games. Once again this would lead me to believe seeing a reg season game in July of 1990 would be highly unlikely. However, things were definitely a lot different back in 1990 so who really knows if the Padres just happened to have some extra cases of Giamatti balls that made their way into games in 1990.

[mikeakac2]

That article makes me think the ball is real. We know they had Giamatti balls before the season started and Rawlings rushed to get NL teams White balls. So imagine they have cases of Giamatti balls in their storage. When the new White balls came in they get stacked on the cases of Giamatti balls. As the season goes on the White balls are depleted and the Giamatti balls are used before a new shipment arrives. That would explain why this ball would be used in July. It sounds reasonable to me. The guy in charge of getting balls out of storage probably doesn't care or even check whos name is on it.

[cardsfan22]

Originally Posted by mikeakac2

That article makes me think the ball is real. We know they had Giamatti balls before the season started and Rawlings rushed to get NL teams White balls. So imagine they have cases of Giamatti balls in their storage. When the new White balls came in they get stacked on the cases of Giamatti balls. As the season goes on the White balls are depleted and the Giamatti balls are used before a new shipment arrives. That would explain why this ball would be used in July. It sounds reasonable to me. The guy in charge of getting balls out of storage probably doesn't care or even check whos name is on it.

But realize that article is talking about the start of the 1989 season and JC hit his 300th on July 30th, 1990, a year and half later. I totally agree with your assessment for the 1989 season and I do actually think its possible for that same scenario to occur into the 1990 season it just seems a little less likely IMO.

[Splinte1941]

Originally Posted by thecatspajamas

Brandon, correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't the balls produced for each season based on who was the league president at the beginning of the year, not the beginning of the season, and therefore 1989 ONL balls would bear Giamatti's name, not Bill White's (since Giamatti was still NL president on January 1, and named Commissioner on April 1).

To my mind, this would seem to be a reasonable assumption since there has to be some lead time to the production of the thousands of balls that would be used in games starting in early April. You can't name a new NL president on April 1, and then 2 days later on Opening Day have a truckload of balls show up ready for game use.

EDIT: See post below.

[cardsfan22]

Originally Posted by Jayworld

Jack Clark lived in McKinney, Texas, in 2007 and 2008 (I used to work with his daughter), and he now lives in Plano, Texas, which is just 15 miles north of Dallas.

Actually I believe he lives in St. Louis. I know he has a show on KFNS AM 590 and his own website says he currently resides in St. Louis.

Just to be clear, I really dont think Jack intentionally tried to pass this ball off as his 300th. If it is not the actual ball I would tend to think maybe the ball was mixed up with another ball he had. The ball is obv 100% from that time period and had information about the 300th hr written on it from what appears to be a while back well before Jack thought about selling the ball. Also, the ball was not sold for that much money so it would seem odd to try and fake it intentionally for such little gain.