![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Exactly - 'Rare' on eBay is more of a marketing tool than an accurate description. While most on this board will see through the false rarity claims on eBay, there are many others on eBay who don't and do pay premiums for relatively common cards. I don't fault the sellers as they're trying to get top dollar for their auctions. I fault the uninformed buyers who not knowing what they're buying.
__________________
T206 518/518 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A problem with rarity numbers is no one knows how many of a given card exists.
After all, the Murphy's Law of Pre-War collecting is purchasing the "only one in existence" means a second will show up on eBay the next week. If you guys decided a rarity scale was the way to go-- you'd have endless arguments of how many of the cards exists. Start with the T206 Honus Wagner. Let's hammer out how many exist. Last edited by drc; 04-23-2012 at 11:42 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Another problem with population reports. Who knows how many of the cards were cracked out(lets say from PSA) and submitted to another grading company.
Hence, there is actually less supply of some cards out there(with respect to graded card only, of course). What is stored in someone's home/vault or yet to be found, will only probably be partially known in the future.
__________________
Be ethical at all times. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It will never happen but the best way to truly find out what is rare and what isn't would be if the value of the card was based on the number that could be proven in existence.
I love using this as an example. I have a 1928 Star Player Candy card of Buddy Myer. Up until I displayed this card on the old board about six years ago, this card was unknown. Now, including mine, there are two known to exist. You would think because of its rarity it MUST be extremely valuable. Not so. Yes, I was offered $1,000 dollars for the card but compared to a T206 Honus Wagner, of which at least 60 more are known, this card is valued WAAAAAAAY less. So, two Buddy Myer cards known to exist and you can buy them for the equivalent of a good computer and an iPhone. Thirty times more T206 Honus Wagners known and, for the same condition card, you are looking at paying the price of a decent sized house in a nice suburban neighborhood. David |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
[rarity + notoriety] x demand = price
I have lots of very rare but obscure cards. Rarity may be through the roof but notoriety and demand are low. This Ruth card is rare, with only a handful of known examples, but obscure: ![]() A 1952 Topps Mantle is common--I could buy one within the hour if I had the scratch--so the rarity figure is relatively low but the notoriety and demand are way up there, so the price is strong even for a beater. Anyone want to swap the Ruth for a 1952 Topps Mantle?
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
one tweak based on your post:
[rarity + notoriety] x demand / ugliness = price |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rare? A dealer saying "I'm too full for dessert" at dinner after a show.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Definition needed on photos | RichardSimon | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 12-12-2009 09:50 PM |
Pre-WWII definition for card collecting | mart8081 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-09-2009 11:53 PM |
Net 54's Definition of Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 10-03-2007 12:27 PM |
Terminology definition | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 08-04-2004 01:34 PM |
the definition of rarity | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 09-16-2003 01:36 PM |