![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since im stoked about winning my third of the sweet cap 460 fact 30 sweeney yellow brown printers scrap "alternative"back from Leon and Scott
![]() I have been discussing the rarity of them also, they are a "new" or alternative back ![]() So i have seen a few over the years and would venture to guess 50-100(excluding dan mckees 50 examples! ![]() ![]() I have 3..... Matty ( dark cap THANKS MARTIN NEAL ![]() ![]() ![]() i have seen Davis, seymour, chance, chase, ect ect....usually there are twins or triplets, but not more than lets say 4 or 5.... How many do you think are out there???????? and if u have one, post a scan..... ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sub set is cool idea, for me Brown Lenox is factory cut and was issued as far as we know so I think if you want a master set of backs that includes BL460 and Brown Lenox....but what the hell do I know i'm one of the only guys who doesn't have a website on T206's.
![]() John |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great points!!
but brown lenox is on there ![]() that is just a color variation ![]() btw Leon or moderator, i accidentally put my yellow / brown in this thread, can u put a seperate post???im lazy and dont feel like re typing ![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Great point!!
i say anything factory cut should be on the main list including brown lenox, red hindu ect and even THE FACTORY CUT upside downs(like your engle)... then a Subset- i vote anything NOT factory cut... in scarcity.. cobb Brown om proof Blank back front ghost obverse ghost or something to this effect.....just playing around.. i doubt cobb was issued at all....so it could be classified here and put the cobb issue to rest man im going to get a load of crap for this one!!!LOL ![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I see the card and can help but not sure what you want done? Keep going Johnny, you can rewrite the books yourself!!
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Jared |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jared.....
i beleive the brown om should be on a "sub-set" list, cause those cards are printer scraps, hand cut and NOT distributed in packs.... Cobb was prob a sales promotion or distributed in tins in an extremely limited/promotion/sales sample ect...... IRONICALLY- most upside down backs were errors and were printed at the factory, factory cut, and distributed in actual packs...some upside down backs(like an om i own) are actually printer scrap(not to be confusing), and are really hand cut cards like Chris b's 4 back up om, or Jamie B.'s sister upside down om off prob the same sl sheet ![]() BROWN LENOX- intentionally printed like red hindy...... SO- brown lenox is kinda like an upside down BACK !!! THEY ARE BOTH TECHNICALLY FACTORY CUT BACKS!! why is one on the list and not the other????????????????????? i think 2 back lists may solve these issues.... PACK DISTRIBUTED / NON ISSUED: just a thought......... pack distributed: 1)LENOX BROWN 2)BROADLEAF 460 3)UPSIDE DOWN BACK(can be any FACTORY CUT BACK) om, piedy ect(these can follow traditional back scarcities to determine rarities instead of re-listing) 3)UZIT 4)DRUM 5) HINDU RED 6)LENOX 7)BL 350(CLOSE W/ CB) 8) CAROLINA B(CLOSE W BL) 9) PIEDY 42 10)AB 460 then the rest....... NON ISSUED: 1) TY COBB 2)BROWN OM 3)GHOST FRONT 4)GHOST BACK 5) NO NAME(TRUE NO NAME) ECT ECT Thoughts????????????????????????????????????? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mrvster,
I can see your point and to a degree understand that maybe a non issued list vs a issued list could be contrived. Although, my qualifications for the current list were never solely about being factory issued or not. The basis for the list was being substantially unique to all the rest (even color variations, purposeful or not). That brings me back to my point that the upside down backs or upside down fronts are not unique in any other way from any current card already on the list. That's why they don't belong and this is why the browns, cobbs and blanks are currently on that list. They are all unique from any other known back. Also, I'll say it one more time, who's to say the fronts weren't printed upside down on those? |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The upside down back is an error. The others are not.
JimB P.S. The Cobb back does not appear to be a point of sale hand out promotion. Since half of the know examples have tobacco staining, it is fair to presume they were packaged with the tobacco/cigarettes. Ads dating from Feb/March 1910 advertising the brand suggest it came out two years before the tins that have tax stamps dating to 1912. My guess is the tins are a different brand from the "Ty Cobb: King of the Smoking Tobacco World" brand. I have an article that is going to be on T206resource.com soon that goes into more detail on these issues. Last edited by E93; 03-06-2012 at 08:42 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTTF: T206 HOFers with backs I need | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-21-2009 06:16 PM |
WTTF T206 HOFer with DRUM back | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 01-26-2009 07:46 AM |
FS: T206 Backs collection - 12 T206 w/different backs - SOLD | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 01-30-2007 08:26 AM |
T206 Systematic Back Study #1 - American Beauty | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-28-2006 07:22 PM |
T206 Back Collecting | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-14-2005 04:44 PM |