 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-23-2012, 06:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I wish the Pirates would start taking something.
__________________
I have counted the stitches on a baseball more than once.[/B] My PM box might be full. Email: jcfowler6@zoominternet.net Want list: Prewar Pirates items 1909 Pirates BF2 Wagner Cracker Jack Wagner and Clarke Love the hobby. 
|
|
#2
02-23-2012, 06:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the sample did sit, you must acquit!
|
|
#3
02-23-2012, 07:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I didnt read the article but I have to think this was a commissioners decision. If so, this makes that idiot commissioner look even less like a true commissioner. Let me see, didn't Selig used to own the Brewers? Nope, no favoritism there.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for.
|
|
#4
02-23-2012, 07:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
http://espn.go.com/mlb/story/_/id/76...ame-suspension
|
|
#5
02-23-2012, 07:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Honestly, this outcome doesn't really do anything for his reputation...Good or Bad...If he did it, he did it. If not, then he didn't. This decision doesn't answer any of that.. Yes, he won the appeal. Sure, by a technicality. But taking full advantage of that technicality was probably the easiest way for Braun and his lawyers to get him off the hook. It doesn't necessarily mean that he did anything, nor does it mean that he didn't. All it means is that this was the easiest road to travel in his appeal.
|
|
#7
02-23-2012, 10:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oddly, for me, I find myself generally agreeing with most of what's been posted, with the exception of one post. Contrarian me is in general agreement....
But Oh, that one post. Thank you Jon Fowler. While I'm not a fan of the Pirates (preferring the Cardinals for 49 years), that is one fine post you've made. I will laugh out loud about it for days, whenever I think of it. Those of us who are fans bow to you, one dedicated Bucs fan. I'm in absolute agreement, and in awe of that!!!! Last edited by FrankWakefield; 02-23-2012 at 10:34 PM.
|
|
#8
02-24-2012, 01:34 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Funny...........
Quote:
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What football item(s) have the best eye appeal? | cmoore330 | Football Cards Forum | 8 | 12-06-2011 01:09 PM |
| OT: Will Verlander get 20 more wins than losses? | t206hound | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 09-19-2011 09:25 AM |
| Eye Appeal -vs- Technical Grade | ls7plus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 05-16-2011 10:06 PM |
| T3s available reduced from eBay NICE APPEAL CLEAN BACKS | JasonD08 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 04-10-2011 07:18 PM |
| How much of a premium (if any) do you put on eye appeal? | Doug | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-12-2010 09:07 PM |
Hybrid Mode
