 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
02-12-2012, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Does anyone doubt it. It is obvious that the BIG submitters get grades higher than the small fish?
Also...Why is it such a big secret about graders qualifications. I have often wondered why a company just doesn't use some type of computerized grading. Where a piece of pasteboard would be evaluated scanned graded according to publish criteria. I am sure the technology exists. A computer would detect a small paper loss or wrinkle that could be missed by humans. Also searching for any alterations, coloring, trimming. Take the guess work out of it. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it ever to good to be true? | Vol | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-24-2011 06:22 PM |
| Hobby Myths Most Accept as True | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 05-16-2010 03:08 PM |
| Passing of a true legend. RIP Curt | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-20-2006 07:29 PM |
| I hope this isn't true, but today someone told me that more than | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 46 | 10-06-2005 09:47 PM |
| Buck Weaver TRUE rookie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 09-23-2002 12:30 PM |
Threaded Mode