NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2012, 01:23 PM
AzMot AzMot is offline
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Default Cy Young Authentication Help

This ball was purchased at auction with AAU (Drew V Max) certification. After numerous searches on this site and others I am very worried. Could I get your opinions.

[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2012, 01:45 PM
CMIZ5290 CMIZ5290 is offline
KEVIN MIZE
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VALDOSTA, GA.
Posts: 6,301
Default

Wow, if it's a fake it's a damn good one. The only thing though is the ink looks so dark and so new. That's what would worry me. What type of ball is it?

Last edited by CMIZ5290; 02-08-2012 at 01:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2012, 01:58 PM
ScottR81's Avatar
ScottR81 ScottR81 is offline
Scott R
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 291
Default

Here mine that I recently purchased from a board member here.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg young auto.jpg (70.1 KB, 300 views)
File Type: jpg young auto 2.jpg (77.5 KB, 299 views)
__________________
"You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can get with a kind word alone." - Al Capone
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:02 PM
AzMot AzMot is offline
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Default

It's a Spalding. Here are pictures of the ball logo.
[IMG]Photobucket[/IMG]
[IMG]Photobucket[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2012, 02:04 PM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMIZ5290 View Post
Wow, if it's a fake it's a damn good one. The only thing though is the ink looks so dark and so new. That's what would worry me. What type of ball is it?
I agree with Kevin on all counts. It looks real, but that signature is darker than virtually every other Cy Young signed balls that I have ever seen, FWIW...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2012, 04:19 PM
MGHPro's Avatar
MGHPro MGHPro is offline
Matt
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,302
Default

If im correct, Giles became president in 51 and Young died in 55, so its a short window to get it signed.
__________________

Matt Bub13@aol.com
Always looking for 40k Kork Grip Bats, Babe Ruth, Honus Wagner, Ty Cobb, Lou Gehrig and Joe Jackson Bats & Gloves
http://oldbaseballbats.webs.com/
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2012, 05:58 PM
BrandonG's Avatar
BrandonG BrandonG is offline
Brandon M. Grunbaum
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Newport Beach, CA
Posts: 230
Default

I'm afraid you've got a problem here. The Giles baseball in the photo is the later 1958-1969 Model ball. Since Cy Young passed in November of 1955, it would have been impossible for him to sign that type of ball. Sorry.

+1 for the baseball expert and not an authenticator! All of this and more can be found in my future publication of: History of the Base Ball
Attached Images
File Type: jpg giles.jpg (30.3 KB, 243 views)
__________________
History of the Baseball Official National & American League Base Ball Guides now available! Here
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:10 PM
GrayGhost's Avatar
GrayGhost GrayGhost is offline
Scott
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Connecticut.
Posts: 9,491
Default

Dumb ? from me. what is the difference in the balls? My eyesight isn't great, so Im missing something
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:16 PM
Big Six's Avatar
Big Six Big Six is offline
M@tt McC@rthy
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 1,485
Default

Looks like the space between the Giles sig. And the title Pres.
__________________
M@tt McC@arthy
I collect Hal Chase, Diamond Stars (PSA 5 or better), 1951 Bowman (Raw Ex or better), 1954 Topps (PSA 7 or better), 1956 Topps (Raw Ex or better), 3x5 Hall of Fame Autographs and autographed Perez Steele Postcards. You can see my collection by going to http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BigSix.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:45 PM
thetruthisoutthere thetruthisoutthere is offline
Christopher Williams
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMIZ5290 View Post
Wow, if it's a fake it's a damn good one. The only thing though is the ink looks so dark and so new. That's what would worry me. What type of ball is it?
I'm curious why you would ask if it's authentic or not after you purchased or won it? Why didn't you research the autograph before you made the purchase?

This is why buyers of forgeries, in my opinion, are 50% of the problem when it comes to forgeries in the hobby. If you don't buy crap like that, then the sellers of forgeries don't stay in business. This puzzles the crap out of me.

Secondly, that Cy Young isn't close to a "good forgery." It's pathetic.

Last edited by thetruthisoutthere; 02-08-2012 at 07:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:53 PM
batsballsbases's Avatar
batsballsbases batsballsbases is offline
Al
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: From Ct+ NY now retired in North Carolina
Posts: 2,206
Default Cy

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayGhost View Post
Dumb ? from me. what is the difference in the balls? My eyesight isn't great, so Im missing something
Scott,
If you look close at the giles autographs they are different.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:57 PM
RichardSimon's Avatar
RichardSimon RichardSimon is offline
Richard Simon
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 5,425
Default

There are differences in the Giles baseballs, thanks for illustrating that Brandon.
I guess Drew Max could get an education here too.
Seems like that particular Cy Young baseball was signed when Cy was in his grave.
__________________
Sign up & receive my autograph price list. E mail me,richsprt@aol.com, with your e mail. Sports,entertainment,history.
-
Here is a link to my online store. Many items for sale. 10% disc. for 54 members. E mail me first.
www.bonanza.com/booths/richsports
--
"I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."- Clarence Darrow

Last edited by RichardSimon; 02-08-2012 at 07:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2012, 07:59 PM
thetruthisoutthere thetruthisoutthere is offline
Christopher Williams
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardSimon View Post
There are differences in the Giles baseballs, thanks for illustrating that Brandon.
I guess Drew Max could get an education here too.
Seems like that particular Cy Young baseball was signed when Cy was in his grave.
Does Drew Max look at anything "forensically?" Geez.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-08-2012, 08:25 PM
GrayGhost's Avatar
GrayGhost GrayGhost is offline
Scott
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Connecticut.
Posts: 9,491
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Six View Post
Looks like the space between the Giles sig. And the title Pres.
Thanks , plus the s in Giles seems to slide further down and to the left on the later ball.

FASCINATING detective work. I wouldn't buy a Bugs Bunny sig from AAU, Research in this case tho, Chris, isn't easy, at least as far as knowing the ball difference. Knowing a legit Cy sig could be researched tho. But, its so hard still, knowing you really can't find anyone who is always right or even most times, seems.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-08-2012, 08:37 PM
thetruthisoutthere thetruthisoutthere is offline
Christopher Williams
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayGhost View Post
Thanks , plus the s in Giles seems to slide further down and to the left on the later ball.

FASCINATING detective work. I wouldn't buy a Bugs Bunny sig from AAU, Research in this case tho, Chris, isn't easy, at least as far as knowing the ball difference. Knowing a legit Cy sig could be researched tho. But, its so hard still, knowing you really can't find anyone who is always right or even most times, seems.
True, Scott, but the fact is, the buyer came here to ask questions after his purchase, which means he began his research after-the-fact.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-08-2012, 09:19 PM
David Atkatz's Avatar
David Atkatz David Atkatz is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thetruthisoutthere View Post
I'm curious why you would ask if it's authentic or not after you purchased or won it? Why didn't you research the autograph before you made the purchase?

This is why buyers of forgeries, in my opinion, are 50% of the problem when it comes to forgeries in the hobby. If you don't buy crap like that, then the sellers of forgeries don't stay in business. This puzzles the crap out of me.

Secondly, that Cy Young isn't close to a "good forgery." It's pathetic.
Nice. Kinda like "She deserved it, dressed like that." There's nothing quite like blaming the victim.

Sorry you got burned on that one, AzMot, but with the rock-solid proof of forgery (proof, rather than opinion), perhaps you can get your money back.
And, for future reference, there are plenty of people here who are happy to help you learn, and won't belittle you for making a mistake.

Last edited by David Atkatz; 02-08-2012 at 09:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-08-2012, 10:34 PM
travrosty travrosty is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,223
Default

If you look at his original post, he trusted the authenticatior. He only came on here to ask after doing some searching on the internet.

You can trust psa and jsa and buy an authenticated item with an LOA from them, then search on the internet and find criticism of psa and jsa, and then show a recently bought wife signed sonny liston on this forum slabbed like this one authenticated by psa, or the other one that was given an LOA from James Spence Authentication and sold at Geppi's, and then you can be called an idiot too by not doing your own liston research beforehand even though it had authentication certs?

If it's a problem of trusting AAU, and getting blasted for it, then what about the poor soul that trusts psa or jsa and ends up with a wife signed? that guy must be a moron too. We have to vet and check out all psa and jsa sigs from now on also. don't trust them and then ask opinions after you buy if you have misgivings about them later on.


Is that how it works? someone has a psa or jsa certed item, comes on here, shows it, asks for opinion, it fails, and he's an idiot for buying it and trusting the authenticator, or is it just someone who trusts and gets burned by an authenticator you don't like? Those are the only idiots I suppose.

Reality is that the authenticators need to be accountable for their authentication, and if someone gets burned, they aren't idiots, but should get their money back or be made whole. To all psa and jsa buyers, in the scenario presented here, if you trust them and end up with a psa or jsa dud, to be fair, you are the problem!

Just pointing out the paradox and hypocrisy in the autograph world. If you get burned by authenticator A, you asked for it, and you are a moron. if you get burned by authenticator b, it was just a mistake, you aren't a moron and no big deal.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg psa.jpg (20.8 KB, 173 views)
File Type: jpg spence.jpg (64.0 KB, 171 views)

Last edited by travrosty; 02-08-2012 at 11:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-09-2012, 12:32 AM
gashouse34's Avatar
gashouse34 gashouse34 is offline
Brandon
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: midwest
Posts: 339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Atkatz View Post
Nice. Kinda like "She deserved it, dressed like that." There's nothing quite like blaming the victim.

Sorry you got burned on that one, AzMot, but with the rock-solid proof of forgery (proof, rather than opinion), perhaps you can get your money back.
And, for future reference, there are plenty of people here who are happy to help you learn, and won't belittle you for making a mistake.
100% agree with you David.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 02-09-2012, 03:36 AM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonG View Post
I'm afraid you've got a problem here. The Giles baseball in the photo is the later 1958-1969 Model ball. Since Cy Young passed in November of 1955, it would have been impossible for him to sign that type of ball. Sorry.

+1 for the baseball expert and not an authenticator! All of this and more can be found in my future publication of: History of the Base Ball
Nice job, Brandon!
I was hoping that you would check in on the intricacies of the Giles ball. I had a feeling that it may provide a clue that would add additional questions about the liklihood that Cy could have signed it.

I would also like to state, in my experience, that later authentic examples of Cy's signature really took a dive in quality later in life. The Cy signature on the ball on this thread is pretty atypical for this time period. It appears too "strong" and "bold" if this makes sense.

Last edited by Scott Garner; 02-09-2012 at 03:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:30 AM
AzMot AzMot is offline
member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for all your responses. I didn't purchase the ball a friend of mine did and asked for my opinion. As I told him I only collect autographs signed in front of me and didn't know very much but had him send me some pictures and agreed to research it. The first thing I did was research the authenticator and that is when I saw the red flag.

It sucks because this was his first vintage purchase and he was pretty stoked about it. I'll finish up my research and send him everything I found , I'm sure he will do the pre-purchase research next time. Expensive lesson to learn.

Thanks again for all the help..By the way great site, lots of good information here. I have it bookmarked and will be spending a lot of time here reading.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:50 AM
Bilko G Bilko G is offline
Bilko Glasier
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 399
Default

what auction was the ball purchased at?


sorry this happened to your friend
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-09-2012, 12:00 PM
thetruthisoutthere thetruthisoutthere is offline
Christopher Williams
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bilko G View Post
what auction was the ball purchased at?


sorry this happened to your friend
This is where he purchased it:

http://azfirearms.auctionflex.com/sh...enum=1&lang=En
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-09-2012, 12:01 PM
thetruthisoutthere thetruthisoutthere is offline
Christopher Williams
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3,900
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrandonG View Post
I'm afraid you've got a problem here. The Giles baseball in the photo is the later 1958-1969 Model ball. Since Cy Young passed in November of 1955, it would have been impossible for him to sign that type of ball. Sorry.

+1 for the baseball expert and not an authenticator! All of this and more can be found in my future publication of: History of the Base Ball
Very nice work and great information, Brandon.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-09-2012, 12:04 PM
scooter729's Avatar
scooter729 scooter729 is offline
Scott S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston area
Posts: 2,702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gashousegang_1 View Post
100% agree with you David.
1,000% agree - let's not jump on someone with blame, when they came looking for some assistance....
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-09-2012, 01:15 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scooter729 View Post
1,000% agree - let's not jump on someone with blame, when they came looking for some assistance....
He just needs advice that will help the next time. I've stated this before and never gotten a single response here, but I'll say it again: Before buying a signed vintage item, study as many examples of the person's signature as possible. Do this YOURSELF - don't rely on an authenticator.

If he had done this, he would have seen that on the Cy Young signatures that seem to have the most likelihood of being authentic, Cy Young almost always brings the pen back up at an acute angle from the bottom of the letters in 'Young' - on this ball, he loops slightly to the right before bring his pen up. Perhaps this in itself is not enough to judge the ball to be a forgery, but it's enough for me personally to avoid it.

The other thing - if he wasn't confident enough in his own ability to judge the authenticity of a signature, he shouldn't have bid. I wouldn't have touched this ball, purely because the signature looked too fresh. I'm sure there are lots of fresh-looking sigs out there, but you might as well go for something that looks like it has a more realistic chance of being authentic.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+

Last edited by Runscott; 02-09-2012 at 01:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-09-2012, 01:19 PM
gnaz01's Avatar
gnaz01 gnaz01 is offline
Gr3g N@z@r3th
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott View Post
I'm sure there are lots of fresh-looking sigs out there
Sure are Scott, anyone can see plenty every month at the Roaches

http://www.myccsa.com/Default.aspx
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-09-2012, 01:25 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnaz01 View Post
Sure are Scott, anyone can see plenty every month at the Roaches

http://www.myccsa.com/Default.aspx
Greg, this just drives me crazy every time I read one of these 'forged signature' threads. Don't get me wrong, I love reading them. But I don't understand how all the experts on this board can't tell when a signature is obviously a fake, just from looking at it. This one is not close - it's obviously fake (and I say this a little hesitantly, because some of my friends think it looks close to real and I honestly don't want to insult people here).

I've said the same thing about id'ing photos - very few in the hobby will actually use their eyeballs to identify anything. They will look at almost everything else first, starting with COA's and LOA's. It's baffling to me. It's sad that the guy purchased it to begin with, but not because he didn't come here first and ask questions. It's much simpler than that: google 'Cy Young signature', images, and see what comes up. It won't take long to realize this is a fake. It's not like this is a Mel Ott.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-09-2012, 01:44 PM
CMIZ5290 CMIZ5290 is offline
KEVIN MIZE
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VALDOSTA, GA.
Posts: 6,301
Default

I can tell you that it looks very close to the 1953 postcard i had, and it passed psa/jsa. For whatever that's worth.....
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:06 PM
Ease's Avatar
Ease Ease is offline
Eric Shaeffer
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Atkatz View Post
Nice. Kinda like "She deserved it, dressed like that." There's nothing quite like blaming the victim.

Sorry you got burned on that one, AzMot, but with the rock-solid proof of forgery (proof, rather than opinion), perhaps you can get your money back.
And, for future reference, there are plenty of people here who are happy to help you learn, and won't belittle you for making a mistake.
Top class post from the doc. +1 zillion.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:09 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMIZ5290 View Post
I can tell you that it looks very close to the 1953 postcard i had, and it passed psa/jsa. For whatever that's worth.....
Kevin, I'd love to see an image of that signature, or any others that passed a reputable authenticator and look like this one.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:21 PM
ScottR81's Avatar
ScottR81 ScottR81 is offline
Scott R
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott View Post
Kevin, I'd love to see an image of that signature, or any others that passed a reputable authenticator and look like this one.
I posted a 1953 post card in this thread.....please tell me your not referring to mine??!
__________________
"You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can get with a kind word alone." - Al Capone
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:26 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottR81 View Post
I posted a 1953 post card in this thread.....please tell me your not referring to mine??!
No, I saw yours and it doesn't have the same loop characteristic at the bottom of the letters. Looks much different in my opinion.

Edited to add: Scott, I'm just a guy with eyeballs and an attention to detail - not an authenticator. I have seen many authenticated autographs that might be good, but I wouldn't touch them. I've also seen plenty that weren't authenticated that I would not hesitate to purchase. The obvious rebuttal to my comments on Young's signature would be: "Yeah, but he COULD have signed it that way." Similar to the comments about the Ted Williams one that I didn't like: "Perhaps it was after his stroke". Hell I even got bashed on that thread for insensitivity toward stroke victims. Same for the Gehrig-signed items that feature one of his oddball, seldom-seen signatures. Or balls like the Gehrig/Ruth one owned by the 'super base-ball collector'. If you want to buy something like that, that you think 'could have' been signed by the player, then you need to be ready for the bad news down the road.

Just my opinion. I don't acquire any of my signed items for re-sell, so what others think about them really doesn't matter to me, and whatever I write here is probably just of entertainment value, if that. I am certainly entertained by these threads, and have learned a lot from guys like Richard Simon who post here.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+

Last edited by Runscott; 02-09-2012 at 02:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:36 PM
ScottR81's Avatar
ScottR81 ScottR81 is offline
Scott R
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott View Post
No, I saw yours and it doesn't have the same loop characteristic at the bottom of the letters. Looks much different in my opinion.
hope that means different in a good way..lol.
__________________
"You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can get with a kind word alone." - Al Capone
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:47 PM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott View Post
Kevin, I'd love to see an image of that signature, or any others that passed a reputable authenticator and look like this one.
Scott,
He posted the 1953 Cy Young GPC on this thread. Go back a couple of pages or so and you will see the front and back of the GPC.

Last edited by Scott Garner; 02-09-2012 at 02:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:49 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Garner View Post
Scott,
He posted the 1953 Cy Young GPC on this thread. Go back a couple of pages or so and you will see the front and back of the GPC.
Yeah, I did. It didn't look similar in my opinion, so I figured Kevin was talking about a different item.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-09-2012, 02:49 PM
gnaz01's Avatar
gnaz01 gnaz01 is offline
Gr3g N@z@r3th
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,320
Default

delete, sorry

Last edited by gnaz01; 02-09-2012 at 02:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-09-2012, 03:08 PM
drc drc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,621
Default

There are way too many Scotts in this thread. I'll let it go this time, but don't do it again.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-09-2012, 03:12 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Here are a few we could talk about

Going clockwise from top-left, in each photo, there are eight (1-4 and 5-8). I picked these to show as many different styles as I could find. Obviously, #3 in photo 1 is the bad signature from the ball. But #2 in photo 1 is also bad in my opinion. I'm just using my eyeballs and my brain's ability to recognize patterns, so tell me I'm wrong, and why.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+

Last edited by Runscott; 12-29-2013 at 06:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-09-2012, 03:12 PM
gnaz01's Avatar
gnaz01 gnaz01 is offline
Gr3g N@z@r3th
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,320
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottR81 View Post
I posted a 1953 post card in this thread.....please tell me your not referring to mine??!
I hope not
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-09-2012, 03:41 PM
ScottR81's Avatar
ScottR81 ScottR81 is offline
Scott R
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott View Post
Here are a few we could talk about

Going clockwise from top-left, in each photo, there are eight (1-4 and 5-8). I picked these to show as many different styles as I could find. Obviously, #3 in photo 1 is the bad signature from the ball. But #2 in photo 1 is also bad in my opinion. I'm just using my eyeballs and my brain's ability to recognize patterns, so tell me I'm wrong, and why.


They all look so different! :0

Besides the wearing factor of the actual signature on whatever item has been signed how do you really know?

As far as how many Scott's there are, the 81 in my name is my birth year so can I at least claim that Im the youngest
__________________
"You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can get with a kind word alone." - Al Capone
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 02-09-2012, 03:58 PM
CMIZ5290 CMIZ5290 is offline
KEVIN MIZE
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: VALDOSTA, GA.
Posts: 6,301
Default

The postcard next to the ball was mine....how do they not look similar? especially, compared to the other ones that are supposedly good?

Last edited by CMIZ5290; 02-09-2012 at 03:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-09-2012, 04:02 PM
ScottR81's Avatar
ScottR81 ScottR81 is offline
Scott R
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 291
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMIZ5290 View Post
The postcard next to the ball was mine....how do they not look similar? especially, compared to the other ones that are supposedly good?
At this point now all I want to know about is the postcard left of the ball.

Because it is mine.

I need a stress test.
__________________
"You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can get with a kind word alone." - Al Capone

Last edited by ScottR81; 02-09-2012 at 04:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-09-2012, 05:14 PM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMIZ5290 View Post
The postcard next to the ball was mine....how do they not look similar? especially, compared to the other ones that are supposedly good?
Kevin, out of all the Cy Young signatures I could find by googling, your postcard has the closest 'first glance' look to the ball's as any - I think he might have used yours as his model.

But the big giveaway in my opinion is the way he brings his pen up from the bottom of the 'u' and 'n' (bringing the pen up to the right). He loops out a little in the ball signature, but forms a 'v' angle on your old card. Another extreme example is that other one I think is a fake - it looks like he does the opposite of a loop, more like Connie Mack's style. Another habit was when he brought his pen back up to the left, he tended to relax and form a loop rather than an angle, but sometimes there was sort of an angle - on the bad one (the ball), and the other one I think's a fake, you see angles rather than loops.

An exception was that when he signed in a hurry, he didn't come back up with his pen (like in the return address and the one where he writes 'Peoli' underneath).

If you practice writing 'Young', trying to duplicate the loop vs the angle vs the inverted loop, for the 'u' and 'n', you'll find that you can probably only do it one of the three ways without the signature looking very unnatural.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:00 PM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drc View Post
There are way too many Scotts in this thread. I'll let it go this time, but don't do it again.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-09-2012, 07:07 PM
scooter729's Avatar
scooter729 scooter729 is offline
Scott S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston area
Posts: 2,702
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drc View Post
There are way too many Scotts in this thread. I'll let it go this time, but don't do it again.
Should we all post copies of our signatures, to compare how we write "Scott"?
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 02-10-2012, 07:11 AM
mr2686 mr2686 is offline
Mike Rich@rds0n
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Ca
Posts: 3,196
Default

If I write out the name Scott, would it be a forgery?
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 02-10-2012, 09:13 AM
Runscott's Avatar
Runscott Runscott is offline
Belltown Vintage
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,657
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr2686 View Post
If I write out the name Scott, would it be a forgery?
Not of my name - I always sign 'Bucky Dent'.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 02-10-2012, 12:13 PM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mr2686 View Post
If I write out the name Scott, would it be a forgery?
No Mike,
We'll invite you into the club with no prior authorization and no disclaimers!
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 02-10-2012, 12:32 PM
GrayGhost's Avatar
GrayGhost GrayGhost is offline
Scott
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Connecticut.
Posts: 9,491
Default

My name is Scott too. What do i get?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 02-10-2012, 12:41 PM
Scott Garner's Avatar
Scott Garner Scott Garner is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 6,757
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GrayGhost View Post
My name is Scott too. What do i get?
A free bowl of soup? No soup for you!
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pep Young, #107 in W514... He's in the Hall of Fame FrankWakefield Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 21 03-17-2011 11:13 AM
E90-1 Young Cle pictures Irv Young Troy Kirk Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 18 06-10-2010 01:07 PM
f/s: e103 lajoie, e92 young cocoa, e93 young other hofers Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 2 07-26-2007 10:31 AM
looking for: e90-1 speaker/e94 young...my once a month plea Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 0 07-07-2007 12:09 AM
E97 Young - T206 Young Question Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 9 02-22-2007 11:04 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:43 AM.


ebay GSB