 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
02-02-2012, 06:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
don't know
I don't know if any of them read this board anymore. I will give them a shout tomorrow and chat with them as they do advertiser and I like the guys in general. This card shouldn't be in one of their holders, or anyone's, unless labeled a reprint.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com 
|
|
#2
02-02-2012, 06:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I appreciate your stance Leon but you can have them. After I had to bust out close to half of my submission that was horribly undergraded, just to watch them slab fakes as real, I am done with them.
Those T205s I submitted were from an original owner family with sharp corners and practically untouched and they gave me 4's. SGC SUCKS! I think they have borderline collapsed into the new GAI of grading. I say they are out of business in 2 years unless there are drastic changes. Dan
|
|
#3
02-02-2012, 07:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
02-02-2012, 08:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
For the record I still like SGC and really like Scott and Bob (Howdy Scott & Bob). They are still my company of choice for what little grading I do. But what do I know I’m a chump hack of a collector anyways with America’s Worst Want List.
I can see why Danny is a bit upset...I have to chuckle a bit but this is pretty rough if you’re him....  Graded/Cracked sold raw.....  Re-Graded/Bumped big time... Before anybody says it’s not the same card yes it is I not only picked them up from SGC for Dan but went thru them and have the SGC slip. Ouch Danno! Before anybody says it’s not the same holder or card yes it is. I not only picked them up from SGC for Dan but went thru them and have the SGC slip etc. Dan I spent about 5 hours at his kitchen table going thru about 200+ OJ’s and many I insisted on taking back up for second looks. Cheers, John
|
|
#5
02-02-2012, 08:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't put much stock in SGC grading anymore as well. Pity, as competition is a good thing amongst graders.
|
|
#6
02-03-2012, 04:55 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jim Rivera saw my Brunswick T205's. They were removed from packs in 1911 and put away. No creases, sharp corners and I got hammered.
I am sure I got hammered on the OJ's and the T205's because I bash grading. We are all human I guess. Thanks for posting the OJ labels John. I was forced to sell that card raw but at least my bidder received a fair grade. Dan
|
|
#7
02-03-2012, 05:03 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I did get a good look at the Brunswick 205s raw and after they were graded and was shocked to see ex plus cards in 4 holders. The Brunswick Cy Yuong 205 graded PSA 7.5 and I think it could have been in a 8 holder and there would have not been a complaint.
__________________
T206Resource.com
|
|
#8
02-03-2012, 01:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
How did you remove the card? The holder looks intact.
Quote:
|
|
#9
02-03-2012, 02:06 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If I were SGC, I would BUY this fake and get it off the market!
Leon,
Thanks for the update; I know if you try to contact SGC by phone you get a better response as well. I do agree with some on the board that SGC does need to handle Customer Service a bit better, but overall they handle things well and the grading and holders are not the issue most of the time. This card may just been something that was floating around for awhile as said. I really would like to see how SGC handles the next year after the changes they made the last few years with their staff. Jimmy
__________________
“Devoted to Bringing Quality Vintage Sports Cards and Memorabilia to the Hobby” https://www.ebay.com/str/jbsportsauctions
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
