![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It is odd that the black and brown tones have not faded, but the green is gone and almost all the blue.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It reminded me of this Street card I bought a few years back.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ron,
I'm no print expert, so take these comments for what they are worth (which is about .09 cents if you factor inflation). The T206 Street card is spectacular and is truly missing colors. While, the T206 McQuillen is faded. Night and day difference between the two cards. Nothing odd about the black and brown tones not fading (although, in the pic they do appear somewhat faded); all things being equal, you would expect both those colors to fade very slowly. In a T206 card, the red would go first, followed by yellow, green, and blue. It's just the way we see color, which is why when you are in a room with no lights everything around you appears black. Lovely Day... Last edited by iggyman; 02-02-2012 at 04:39 PM. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I saw this BIN a few days ago before it sold. I was tempted, but had my doubts. Compared to 'real' scraps - this isn't one. Bleached or faded on the front IMHO. Plus the high BIN price with no mention possible ink flaws, fading, or printer's scrap...
Last edited by jp1216; 02-02-2012 at 05:57 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've been collecting T206's for 35 years and I've never seen one with these odd characteristics. Green and blue badly faded, and other colors ok. The back is not faded. No evidence of glue or back damage from a scrapbook. If it had been soaked in a chemical or bleach I would have expected the back to fade and the browns/grays on the front to fade. I'm not sure how a T206 could fade in this manner. If anyone has scans of a similar situation I'd love to see it.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Missing blue, these were part of a large group that are believed to be faded.
![]()
__________________
T206 gallery Last edited by atx840; 02-02-2012 at 06:33 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Chris,
On the M. Brown it is interesting that the blue ink seems to be missing. On the Bender, the blue is partly gone but the green remains. Perhaps there is some sort of chemical that could have caused this. How do the backs look on those? Were they scrapbook removal or faded? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The other colors are ok????
Quote:
By the way, I will concede one point. When I saw this card on eBay, the only thing that was a little bit perplexing was the back side. As we all have learned, prolonged exposure to light will cause a T206 to fade (as the collage in the current Huggins and Scott auction easily proves). Light would be a possible explanation for the fading, but I believe that the McQuillen was exposed to chemicals. If that is the case, I have no intelligent explanation for the fact that the back side was left somewhat unscathed (the "red" Sweet Caporal colors are not that vibrant but they are far from faded). A chemical explanation of why the back seems unaffected is a little bit of a mystery to me, and luckily for both of us, I have no interest in submerging or even misting a T206 card with bleach. Lovely Day... |
![]() |
Tags |
mcquillan, missing colors, t206 |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T201 Mecca, T205 Gold, T206 White, OM T210-3 | npa589 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 14 | 10-21-2011 07:01 PM |
WTB: T206 Matty White Cap, Johnson Pitching and Cobb Red Port PSA/SGC 4-5 | DeanH3 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-06-2011 05:20 PM |
FS: Two T206 Sovereign - Burke & Mcquillan - PRICE LOWERED | npa589 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 3 | 03-17-2011 11:10 PM |
SURVEY..is your T206 Charlie Hemphill a "rare" variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-14-2007 11:09 AM |
T206 Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-28-2001 04:58 PM |