|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The card was altered when someone wrote on it. It's been altered many, many times as evidenced by the corner and edge wear, plus there seems to be a dab of 30's DNA on that right border.
______________________________________ The '33 WWG was already in the PSA case when I bought it, wanted to clarify that before I mention this. Just holding the WWG caused the check mark to look like a scuff mark because it's much smaller in hand than in the scan; never thought anything about it being a check mark while holding it. But this brings up an interesting point: someone mentioned how it was common for people to add color to their faded cards years ago, and while I couldn't identify with that statement then, I'm now thinking about this card: ![]() While I wouldn't even attempt to further alter this marked/erased card myself, would it be reasonable in this case? The back of the card has writing as well, the content of which indicates it was written approx 1935: ![]() What about the front where that white area is? A T206 Wagner was significantly, intentionally altered (rebuilt?) and holdered as such by PSA, I think. Would it be appropriate for authentication companies to professionally repair things such as this, slab them altered, and specify what the alteration was. Before and after scans/photos included. It's acceptable for cracked/broken game used bats to be professionally repaired. Now, I do not think anything negative about soaking cards, and I'm really not sure how that's done. But from what I've gathered, its done to remove glue residue, etc, from previously scrap-booked cards. How would this be different than that? It's the same mistake: someone glued those cards in a scrapbook many years ago; someone wrote RF on the '33 Goudey many years ago. Again, I think nothing about soaking and enjoy when collectors post before and after results of soaking. I prefer the erased check mark to a trim job, and I don't think color was added to the erased area. If it was, he or she did a poor job recoloring. What are your thoughts? |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Altered T204s in Legendary - Group Buy? | Matt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-13-2010 10:41 AM |
| FS: 1909 Obak Christian (altered) -- $35 -- SOLD | Anthony S. | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 03-17-2010 05:13 PM |
| How do you estimate price on altered cards in big auctions? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-27-2006 11:54 AM |
| Why can't an altered card be graded? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 10-17-2005 11:28 PM |
| Slabbed and altered vintage cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 08-29-2002 02:56 PM |