![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it would tough to call any other sets "popular" in the same sense as Topps and Bowman. I personally like the Red Man sets and the regionally issued Kahn's Weiner sets. Wilson Weiners are widely collected to the extent they can be. In my mind many of these sets are limited in popularity by their original distribution and the fact that many collectors never collected them as a kid.
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Red Man's and Exhibits are certainly available, affordable, and collectible from the 50's
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fleer did the 59 teddy ballgame set, also can't forget one of my favorites 59 Bazooka. aloha, dave.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I also like the Red Man cards. Hadn't seen the 59 Bazooka but I searched a few and like their look as well.
By my original question, what I meant is: back in the 50's, what were the kids collecting? After topps and bowman issues, what were the most popular sets for kids to collect in the 50's ? Tony |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
By far my favorite post war set..............but a bear to finish. Been working on it over ten years. A slow burn.
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Check out my aging Sell/Trade Album on my Profile page HOF Type Collector + Philly A's, E/M/W cards, M101-6, Exhibits, Postcards, 30's Premiums & HOF Photos "Assembling an unfocused collection for nearly 50 years." Last edited by HRBAKER; 01-21-2012 at 09:40 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's two votes for 59 Bazooka. Those are 59 Bazooka's right?
What about Berk Ross ? What's their story? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Red Hearts are cool, as are Dan Dee
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been studying that 1959 Bazooka card of Rocky Colavito - great looking set, by the way, the photography almost rivals the '53 Bowmans. But, it puzzles me that the photo was apparently taken in Yankee Stadium. A piece of the famous facade is visible in the upper right corner. But, Colavito is wearing his home white Indians uni, so it wouldn't have been prior to a road game, right? I thought about an All-Star game photo op, but the only such game played in NY was 1960, after Rocky had been traded to Detroit. I'm certain the background could not be old Cleveland Muni stadium, as there was no such facade there, so why was the Rock posing in his home uni in Yankee Stadium in the 1950's? Maybe I'm missing a simple explanation.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Steve,
Good observation abaout the home uni of Colovito in NY. I have two possible explainations (niether of which I am certain are correct). 1. There is a possibility that the photo was taken before an exebition game. At the end of spring training sometimes teams would play a game or two in the big parks right before the season started. Is it possible that Cleavland played some other team in Yankee stadium before the season started? Not sure but worth looking into. 3. My second, and more likely possibility, is that it's not Yankee stadium. While I see what you are talking about with the facade it is out of focus and cound just be the corner of a grandstand. I was at old Yankee stadium a few times years ago and I don't remember the upper deck hanging so close over the lower seats as was appears in this photo. I seem to remember it sweeping back much farther than was apears to be in this picture. Like I said I'm not sure which, if either, of my statements explains it but a good observation none the less on your part. Drew |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'd go with exhibits; nationally available, not associated with a product that wasn't supposed to be sold to minors, hundreds of cards issued, readily available on the current market.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm partial to the "meat" cards, especially Briggs. Growing up in the Wash., DC, area, we ate hot dogs frequently when I was a kid in the 1950s. But, I didn't care to save the Briggs cards - they were sorta greasy, but worse, they didn't have any player bios/stats on them like the Bowman & Topps cards did! Oh, how I have regretted not saving a few Briggs panels!
![]() Val Last edited by ValKehl; 01-23-2012 at 12:45 PM. Reason: correct spelling |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I've always liked the 1952 Berk Ross issue, but I don't think they were all that readily available to everyone.... I always wonder how popular the Fleer 3 Stooges cards were back in the day too.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Harper's weekly. Full issues or just the woodcuts? | novakjr | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 27 | 04-04-2011 07:12 AM |
quick SGC submission question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-01-2008 12:25 AM |
Quick t206 Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-29-2008 10:35 AM |
quick price guide question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-05-2008 06:05 PM |
New Here, Quick Question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 11-30-2007 07:48 AM |