![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think such a registry would have to take into consideration the grade of the card. I think it is pretty easy to put the T206 set (520) together in a poor graded, raw set.
But, to put the set together in PSA6 or SGC70 or something like that is very difficult and very expensive. So, the problem with such a registry that you are talking about is how to "grade" the raw cards. I might call a card NrMt, but it could really be trimmed. So "grading" the raw cards is where there would be trouble and where there's competition in such a registry would open some people up to over-grading their raw cards. To simply have a registry where a beater, raw T206 gets the same amount of "credit" as a PSA7 card would not be of any benefit, in my opinion. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New PSA Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-22-2008 02:10 PM |
Ramly set available-4th set on the registry | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 9 | 05-05-2007 09:31 PM |
PSA Set Registry -- Tattle Tale or Due Diligence | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-14-2007 10:31 AM |
T206 Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-27-2006 06:50 PM |
Set Registry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-19-2005 11:59 AM |