Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasLeaguer
That was pretty funny Scott. I looked all over the page for awhile in confusion, then I saw it up top and laughed pretty hard. I updated my profile and here's my email as well, rcbeevers@hotmail.com, if anyone wants to message me.
|
Ross, I am really sorry for attacking you. Seriously, this entire 'us vs them' thing regarding the new site is bullshit, but I don't expect it to go away, just due to the nature of why the site was created to begin with. There apparently was always some alignment behind either Ted or Tim, but now it's more defined, involves more people, and is uglier.
I'm out of this fray now. I only jumped in to support a friend, and mentioned my own site as a supporting example - I was slow to say anything, because I knew the disciples of the 'big 4' would be all over my @ss immediately, and that the multitude of newbies would be joining in order to get their bite of fish. The word I'm hearing now is that the T206 gods thought my site was poorly done and needed to be recreated in their own image. Okay, I will not use their names in vain.
I also freely admit that I know DINK compared to the creators. My interest in the T206 set has always involved the very esoteric aspects - not the numbers and statistics. But I'm glad others are, as it has given us amazing insight into the set that we wouldn't otherwise have.