 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
12-17-2011, 06:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Leon I wish they were E90-1s
 , then this McLean I have would be worth 10++X more (McLean is one of the toughest E90-1s). These may be all from the same find, as mine was graded only 2 cards after yours. technically the McLean also could be a E101 too... and your Miller "fielding" can be a E102 (used to be known as an extremely rare card, but more have surfaced since Lipset said he knew of only 1) 
Last edited by fkw; 12-17-2011 at 06:09 PM. 
|
|
#2
12-17-2011, 07:08 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
No doubt they could be any series with the same front. As I said before, it's my personal preference to use the lowest common ACC set #. (I just changed it on my site too. I had it the way SGC had it labeled..) ** This is just my personal preference. I doubt there is a right or wrong way.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#3
12-17-2011, 07:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
So is this a debatable topic?
My undersatnding goes like this for e92's...4 "different sets"... 40 cards in the Dockman 50 cards in each of the Croft and allen and crofts cocoa 62 nadja caramels... When I ask about the 12 nadja (all StL) I refer to the ones that do not have either croft back or a dockman back. Are these considered 4 seperate sets then? Are e104s and e92's the same thing? I have 2 different checklists for these.
|
|
#4
12-17-2011, 07:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#5
12-17-2011, 07:33 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
12-17-2011, 07:39 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
|
#7
12-17-2011, 07:46 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
E104's are all portraits with blue captions
this link breaks it down easier than I can explain it http://www.oldcardboard.com/e/e1/e10...?cardsetID=746 The E92 Nadjas have the same fronts (images and black caption) as some E90-1 and the other E92 sets., thats why they arent grouped with E104 I believe Ive always thought the blank back (anonymous) E104s did not come in Nadja products, but maybe some other unknown candy/bread/tobacco ?? Last edited by fkw; 12-17-2011 at 07:51 PM.
|
|
#8
12-17-2011, 08:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
E92 Nadja availability
I really like the E92 Nadja issue; it's nice to to read comments about some of the less collected sets.
I've played around a bit with trying to collect a higher-grade St. Louis team set for about a year. I've been able to collect the Bailey, Bresnahan, Ellis, & both Stones (pictures of my cards attached). I know there are currently a several more (Phelps, and Wallace) available for higher buy-it-now prices on eBay than I want to pay. But I haven't seen higher grade examples of the (2) Hartzells, (2) Howells, the Oakes and O'Hara cards come up for sale since I started looking. I consider any graded E-card over EX higher grade. I know there was a large group of St. Louis cards discovered a while back and many of the nice looking St. Louis Nadjas come from that find, but I wonder if anyone knows if it was only certain St. Louis players that were found, and if I'm looking in vain for nice examples the players that I have not already purchased. I've also noted that it is virtually impossible to find higher grade examples of the non-St. Louis players. The Dots Miller card looks sharp, but there is tape on the back. A few months ago several of these non-St. Louis cards came up for sale on eBay, I regret that I didn't bid on more of them. Best regards, Joe
|
|
#9
12-25-2011, 01:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think there are 62 subjects
We have had a couple of threads on this and there are only 58 Nadja's confirmed. Lou Lipset and BCD have seen a Cobb. Pete Calderon and BCD have seen Evers. Tim Newcomb has a Knabe. Bescher, Wild Bill Donovan, Larry Doyle with bat & Zimmerman have no graded examples and no one replied that they had seen examples.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
