|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
2.5 & 5
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Duffy 1.5
Schmidt 5.0 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
1 and 2
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA 3 and PSA 3.
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'll give it a whirl...
Duffy - PSA 3 Schmidt - PSA 3 edit: I see Chuck W. just beat me to it...great minds think alike!
__________________
Current projects: White Sox prewar type set White Sox T206 Master set 1952 Topps set Last edited by Tom S.; 12-14-2011 at 06:04 PM. Reason: added edit info |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
1 & 6
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
2 and 3.5
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Duffy - PSA 2
Schmidt - PSA 4 MK Todd |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Frank,
I'm not sure if you've read the rules of this community web site/bull board. If you start a contest you have to offer a vintage card with a value of >$100 as a prize. The rule was put in place to ensure to increase participation in the contest. So, what's the prize? One quick question - we are making a lot of assumptions about the cards being shown. Can we assume that there are no small creases (or other imperfections besides what's visible in the pictures/scans) on either card?
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Fred,
Okay, I'll throw in my Cobb, that's Reggie Cobb. Frank |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
2 and 5.5
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'll whirl.....
The Schmidt appears to have glue stains on the back side. Thus, it got hammered by an experience grader who mercifully gave it a "2." While the Duffy, despite the obvious tobacco(?) stains and rounded corners received a "2.5" by some rookie grader who had only been on the job for a week, By the way, I totally concur with what Fred said in the previous post. Lovely Day... |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Iggy, I was on the same wavelength, but thought 2 and 1.5. Ouch
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't do too well on guessing PSA grades, but based on what I've seen.....
Duffy 6 Schmidt 3.5 Thanks for the contest! Best, Andy |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Visually the Duffy is a 2 and the Schmidt is a 5...but I suspect they are both the same grade, and that is the point of the contest.
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA University, I always wanted to learn about prostate glands. is the final exam called a prostate exam? LOL
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
1.5 and 4
__________________
R Dixon |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
1.5 and 5.5
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Duffy PSA 2 (MK)
Schmidt PSA 1 for back paper loss |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
|
2(ST) and 4
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm going with 4 for the Duffy and 1/1.5 for the other.
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
1.5 & 4.5
|
|
#24
|
||||
|
||||
|
Are duplicate answers allowed? Before scrolling through the other suggestions, I came up with 2 and 5.5. So if I'm allowed to duplicate another, I'll stick with that. (I could be swayed to 1.5 and 5.5, but someone else already guessed that too, so I'll stick with my initial.)
Thanks for sharing, --S
__________________
collecting primarily T206, 1940 Play Ball, 1947-66 Exhibits, 1952 Bowman, 1964 Topps Giants, Yankees HOFers. E-mails preferred over PM. |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would say 1.5 and 3.
|
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
I will guess 3 & 2.
PSA sometimes goes easy on staining, like on the Duffy but they are tough when there is glue residue. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Seasons wishes for a low PSA
__________________
Favorite MLB quote. " I knew we could find a place to hide you". Lee Smith talking about my catching abilities at Cubs Fantasy camp. |
|
#28
|
||||
|
||||
|
Three correct entries out of forty. You know who you are......and now everyone else does. Duffy average guess was 2.05. Schmidt average guess was 3.34
I'm happy with the deal I got on both cards for different reasons. Beauty's only skin deep, ya, ya, ya Leaving for California in the morning. Last edited by frankbmd; 05-05-2016 at 09:59 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New Idea for Grading Photographic Cards | barrysloate | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-02-2011 10:10 AM |
| Grading discussion- Revolutionizing :) the hobby... | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 70 | 11-19-2010 03:17 PM |
| Should Seller Reimburse Buyer For Grading Fees? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 11-24-2009 11:08 PM |
| What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 09:42 AM |
| Grading Co. Burlesque | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-12-2003 10:18 PM |