 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
11-30-2011, 06:43 AM
|
||||
|
||||
So why did it sell for less?
For those who find the Probstein card to be the best of the bunch (this includes me), why did it sell for less? Here are the only differences I see:
Broadhurst "appears" to have a crease, while Probstein "appears" to be crease free Broadhurst sold first (on a Monday at 9:30pm EST) while Probstein sold on the following Sunday at 10:10pm EST. Broadhurst listing contains a backscan. Looking at the bid history: only two people went over $75 for the Broadhurst; the underbidder (n***n - 3153) went to $128. four bidders went over $75 for the Probstein; n***n bid again, but this time stopped at $110. two bidders over $75 on the PWCC; n***n was the underbidder AGAIN, stopping at $77. I think if there would have been a backscan on the Probstein, it would have gone $20+ higher than where it ended. Thoughts? 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A Tale of Two Matty's | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-23-2011 10:14 PM |
| splitting a tale at nationals at chicago | justinstaff756 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-31-2011 12:33 PM |
| PSA Set Registry -- Tattle Tale or Due Diligence | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-14-2007 10:31 AM |
| ironic tale | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-17-2006 03:44 PM |
| The Sad Tale of Jimmy O'Connell | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-15-2004 04:31 PM |
Threaded Mode