![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I had recently picked up an SGC40 T206 Magee (Portrait) in a lot and was excited when I saw one sell on eBay last week (11/21) for $130:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/300622425109 Then Sunday (11/27) another one sold for $121 (with shipping): http://www.ebay.com/itm/140643885037 And wouldn't you know it, a third sold last night (11/28) for a paltry $81: http://www.ebay.com/itm/250937352768 I say this somewhat jokingly... but in one week the "market price" for SGC40 Magee Portraits dropped nearly 40%! In my opinion the Probstein card was the nicest, but the auction only had a scan of the front of the slab. The Broadhurst card appears to have a crease (upper left), yet yielded the best price. The PWCC listing has nice large scans of the front and back, appears crease-free, but has significant rounding of the corners. A few questions... Is a crease more acceptable than rounded corners? Does the lack of a back scan leave money on the table? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would prefer rounded corners to creases. I would like to point out as a Phillies collector that both the T206 Magee portrait and batting cards really fluctuate in price for some odd reason.
Andrew |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I really don't like rounded corners, in some cases it really makes the card look worse than it is. If all the corners are somewhat sharp and it has a "light" crease it doesn't bother me as long as it's not into the face of the person on the card.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
i like the Magee cards in the order they are listed: broadhurst, then probstein, then pwcc.
The middle one is nice, but something to me is weird about the top and bottom cuts. Like the edges are sharper/straighter than the side edges or something. I'm not saying its trimmed cuz its probably not, but for some reason thats the appearance it gives me. I prefer a light crease or two over rounded corners. Some light corner wear is fine. If its excessive like the PWCC Magee, its too detracting. Creases give it character ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd much rather have a crease then rounded corners. If you have a cards in a binder with sharp corners but the occasional crease, to me, it looks better then having an occasional card with round corners.
A crease is instant damage for the most part. I've found creased cards with sharp corners and a great surface and not much other general wear. Edit: I think that third magee sold for less because its not as nice as the other two... Last edited by Matthew H; 11-29-2011 at 10:04 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When did the portrait sales get this high? I think the last sale is close to where I remember them selling at on average. Maybe I'm wrong, but $130 seems a bit high to me. However, looking at the completed listings, it does seem like these sale prices reflect the average...
I have yet to get the Portrait version...I better hurry before they reach the amount the error is going for ![]()
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just wanted to say that EVERY deal with Rick probstien, buying or selling, is a pleasurable and fair deal. Top shelf operation----- I like them!
In my opinion the Probstein card was the nicest! Regards, Bill Hedin |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree!!! Just wish he would ship to Canada....he always has great stuff
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hands down. Agreed!!
__________________
Tony A. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For those who find the Probstein card to be the best of the bunch (this includes me), why did it sell for less? Here are the only differences I see:
Broadhurst "appears" to have a crease, while Probstein "appears" to be crease free Broadhurst sold first (on a Monday at 9:30pm EST) while Probstein sold on the following Sunday at 10:10pm EST. Broadhurst listing contains a backscan. Looking at the bid history: only two people went over $75 for the Broadhurst; the underbidder (n***n - 3153) went to $128. four bidders went over $75 for the Probstein; n***n bid again, but this time stopped at $110. two bidders over $75 on the PWCC; n***n was the underbidder AGAIN, stopping at $77. I think if there would have been a backscan on the Probstein, it would have gone $20+ higher than where it ended. Thoughts? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Tale of Two Matty's | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-23-2011 10:14 PM |
splitting a tale at nationals at chicago | justinstaff756 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-31-2011 12:33 PM |
PSA Set Registry -- Tattle Tale or Due Diligence | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-14-2007 10:31 AM |
ironic tale | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-17-2006 03:44 PM |
The Sad Tale of Jimmy O'Connell | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-15-2004 04:31 PM |