![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd much rather have a crease then rounded corners. If you have a cards in a binder with sharp corners but the occasional crease, to me, it looks better then having an occasional card with round corners.
A crease is instant damage for the most part. I've found creased cards with sharp corners and a great surface and not much other general wear. Edit: I think that third magee sold for less because its not as nice as the other two... Last edited by Matthew H; 11-29-2011 at 10:04 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
When did the portrait sales get this high? I think the last sale is close to where I remember them selling at on average. Maybe I'm wrong, but $130 seems a bit high to me. However, looking at the completed listings, it does seem like these sale prices reflect the average...
I have yet to get the Portrait version...I better hurry before they reach the amount the error is going for ![]()
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just wanted to say that EVERY deal with Rick probstien, buying or selling, is a pleasurable and fair deal. Top shelf operation----- I like them!
In my opinion the Probstein card was the nicest! Regards, Bill Hedin |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree!!! Just wish he would ship to Canada....he always has great stuff
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hands down. Agreed!!
__________________
Tony A. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
For those who find the Probstein card to be the best of the bunch (this includes me), why did it sell for less? Here are the only differences I see:
Broadhurst "appears" to have a crease, while Probstein "appears" to be crease free Broadhurst sold first (on a Monday at 9:30pm EST) while Probstein sold on the following Sunday at 10:10pm EST. Broadhurst listing contains a backscan. Looking at the bid history: only two people went over $75 for the Broadhurst; the underbidder (n***n - 3153) went to $128. four bidders went over $75 for the Probstein; n***n bid again, but this time stopped at $110. two bidders over $75 on the PWCC; n***n was the underbidder AGAIN, stopping at $77. I think if there would have been a backscan on the Probstein, it would have gone $20+ higher than where it ended. Thoughts? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Tale of Two Matty's | Runscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 11-23-2011 10:14 PM |
splitting a tale at nationals at chicago | justinstaff756 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 05-31-2011 12:33 PM |
PSA Set Registry -- Tattle Tale or Due Diligence | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 03-14-2007 10:31 AM |
ironic tale | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-17-2006 03:44 PM |
The Sad Tale of Jimmy O'Connell | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-15-2004 04:31 PM |