![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Regardless of whether we are talking print or photo (this would obviously be a print) it is not authentic, you can tell by the paper and the crazing in the black portions and the fact that the photo is not very crisp. 1942 was during WW2 and paper was scarce, but technology was good. I doubt that they would have made a "print" of a Negro League team at this time period where paper was in such short supply that they were having scrap paper drives on every street corner. 99.9% sure by sight alone this is not authentic to the period add in the WW2 factor and with Phil's assesment I would say we are pretty certain here.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I'm surprised that every print you've seen from the '40s was crisp and made using the best technology available - I've seen plenty of cheap-looking items, some much cheaper-looking than this, that were period. But if everything you've seen was made using the best technology available (and you've never seen any 1940's supplements or premiums), then I completely understand why you are 99% sure that this is not period.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with what Runscott said, I've seen many poor quality print items from the war years - I collect scorecards from that period and the paper and printing especially on minor league items are worse than they were in the 1930's when quality paper stocks were limitless and all the master printers were not in the service. I'd venture to say that ephemera from Negro League teams would be of the same quality as the minor league and semi-pro stuff I have. As for wartime shortages, the Grays made much of their money playing exhibition games with town and semi-pro teams even during the war and advertising was very important so I could see how a generic team photo might have been produced in 1942 or 43 by the Grays to send out in a press kit type of thing but I would expect a team name or contact to be printed on the front or back. If it is on card stock it could have been cut down from a larger broadside - we've all seen that before.
That all said, I'm in the camp that this is not real, just made to look old. The printing looks a little "soft" to me, not what I would expect from that time period. The paper looks too aged as well - wartime paper was pretty poor stuff but unless this is printed on thin paper (which is very brittle and turns yellow) and not a card stock I would expect it to have been a little less yellow. And by the way Smokey Joe Williams is not in that team photo - he retired about 10 years before the shot was taken. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I did not make myself very clear, I was just saying that good technology was available in 1942, not that it was always used. I was just saying that poor quality combined with paper shortage of WW2 made the possibility of this being authentic even less. I agree with you guys, just did not myself very clear.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1912 Red Sox paper team photo | laughlinfan | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 13 | 09-14-2011 05:35 AM |
Team Photo Circa 1915 | cfc1909 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 19 | 04-13-2010 03:16 AM |
New Pickup - 1883 State University of Iowa Baseball team photo | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 10 | 07-30-2007 07:18 AM |
Gray's team photo advice. | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 05-16-2007 06:55 AM |
1918 Company? Team photo help | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-20-2005 11:35 AM |