T206 Boston American team set

[Bosox Blair]

I have not included him in mine. No real great rationale - the card just doesn't fit visually into the subset, and it is an expensive common.

Cheers,
Blair

[milkit1]

I have a white sox team set and as far as I'm concerned you have to have every card for it to be a set. I got a presentable one for $50.

[sox1903wschamp]

Originally Posted by Bosox Blair

I have not included him in mine. No real great rationale - the card just doesn't fit visually into the subset, and it is an expensive common.

Cheers,
Blair

I have also not included the Smith in my subset but then again, I include the T3 Lord of Boston and Chicago fame in my Bost-American Turkey subset so like Blair states above, us collectors have no real "rationale" ..although he is clearly in a Boston uni here and the same with the Niles T3 which is dual teams but a Bost uniform so I include him.

[Bosox Blair]

Originally Posted by sox1903wschamp

I have also not included the Smith in my subset but then again, I include the T3 Lord of Boston and Chicago fame in my Bost-American Turkey subset so like Blair states above, us collectors have no real "rationale" ..although he is clearly in a Boston uni here and the same with the Niles T3 which is dual teams but a Bost uniform so I include him.

LOL - me too on all counts...so maybe there is a rationale that only the two of us understand....

Cheers,
Blair

[shaunsteig]

I'm gonna differ with the trend on this thread, but my instinct would be to include him. He played on Boston during the time that the set was produced, and has a card from the set ascribing him to the Boston team. Just cause the Boston team designation was added to the Chicago instead of replacing it, and that the picture front wasn't changed, shouldn't exclude him from the Boston team set.
--S