![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Wow! No offense but in my opinion that Stallings looks a bit dirty for a 4.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Cheers, Blair
__________________
My Collection (in progress) at: http://www.collectorfocus.com/collection/BosoxBlair |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My two. Love CJs!!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
1914:
__________________
... http://imageevent.com/derekgranger Working on the following: HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%) 1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 116/119 (97.5%) Completed: 1911 T332 Helmar Stamps (180/180) 1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate (180/180) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
OK.......
How many total sets are out there Psa, SGC and others? What are the hardest commons? How many collectors on this forum are trying to put a set together? and what condition (grade span)? Do you like the fact that your cards have slight staining on them to prove that they came out of a box or do you want sterile clean cards in any grade? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's my problem with Cracker Jacks, and its sort of my same issue with M116s...
How do you calculate for condition when there are so many that were found in pristine condition in envelopes many years later? There is just so much opportunity to be one-upped condition-wise, and I really don't think they look that great with staining -- even if staining is normal. There are just too many high grade CJs on ebay even as I type this now to get a rationale value for lesser condition stuff, in my humble opinion.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the stains as they add character and were obtained in the child-like way of eating candy. Im going ro the set, trying to finish in 10 years, in lower grade 1-3 range. My cards need to be writing free, rip free, no pin holes but dont mind other damage but focusing on eye appeal. Started in may 2010 on this, my most favorite of cards. And who cares about being 1-up'd? I try not compare my cards to others and focus on buying a condition I can live with and enjoy and not cringe at.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E145 Cracker Jack Griffith- SGC 60 under $300 | Leon | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 11-29-2010 12:49 PM |
Hey Leon - Fix your web page | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-13-2008 07:19 AM |
Slightly OT / Did the Cubs fix the 1918 World Series? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-19-2008 08:52 PM |
E145 1914 Cracker Jack sizing | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-11-2006 03:36 AM |
please tell me how to fix this "number" problem | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 02-03-2002 08:25 PM |