![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like Dave, I can remember reading about the supposed scarcity of the card and I think that drove many sales of the card at higher prices for some time. Sort of like the Bass boys cornering the market in silver
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Yea I also noticed that the 1957 Topps Sandy Koufax card was a big deal back then as well, nowadays it does not seem to have any major significance over the other 50s card.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Another card from back then that was "hot" was the 1966 Gaylord Perry. It is a high number and is short printed but I think it was being sold for more back then than it is now. I remember seeing it at one of the Nationals for several hundred dollars back in the early 1980's.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Back then there was also a bigger fluctuation between retirement and HOF election. As the player approached retirement there was a bit of a surge as people gathered rookies and other cards thought to be particularly difficult. Then a drop off after retirement, usually about 3 years of decline. Then 2 years of sizeable increase anticipating election. The more likely someone was to be a first year electee, the bigger the runup. Especially if they were well liked. Then a predictable dropoff about a year after election once the publicity died down.
There were similar price bumps around landmark events, 400HR, 3000 hits. I was never organized enough, but a HS friend made some decent money buying particular cards in bulk during the lulls,and selling during the upswing. Todays publicity makes stuff like that much harder, the landmarks are expected and anticipated for years, and HOF election doesn't carry quite the impact it once did. For bigger fun, try to track regional pricing, another aspect of the pricing that's greatly diminished. Steve B |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recently read in an old SCD about the Brooks Robinson card. The SCD was from 1979 or 1980. I forget what exactly it said, but everyone thought it was rare and there were buy ads for $25 each.
To me it seems like there was just more assumed scarcity for issues. One writer wrote every issue about how he couldn't find any 1935 National Chicle FB cards. There for awhile, 1980 Topps Super cards were considered rare as well. I got a chuckle out of that one. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That 67 Brooks was hyped severely in 79 and 80. And because of the hype, they were coming out of the woodwork. I was at a show in St.Louis in April of 1980 and they had "instant auctions" for walk in material and this card was auctioned several times that weekend. I was thinking it can't be that scarce.....
Other over valued cards at the time relative to the rest of the set was the 72 Carew and Garvey and the 70 Bench. The woodwork has taken care of bringing the values down relative to cards in those respective sets. Last edited by sox1903wschamp; 11-04-2011 at 09:18 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1974-1978 baseball FS raw | robedits | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-01-2009 03:08 PM |
1970-1973 baseball FS raw | robedits | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-01-2009 03:06 PM |
OPC sets/singles 1975-1988 baseball | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2009 09:08 PM |
OPC singles/sets 70s-80s (baseball) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 06-16-2008 09:15 AM |
UPDATED 1951-1969 BASEBALL SINGLES FS | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-04-2008 10:12 AM |