![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Again those other things you mention like Marquard "B" are not changes made deliberately to the card.
The Marquard "B" was discussed and shown by several board members in a thread within the last year or so. It's an interesting mark (not a Boston B by the way) but not something added intentionally. Marquard "B" Thread For a little more history on the Doyle error read this: Click Here Last edited by Abravefan11; 11-03-2011 at 10:40 AM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Magie and Doyle errors became legends because the uncorrected versions are rare and expensive. If there were an equal number of "Magie" and "Magee" cards, and both were priced as commons, they wouldn't be legendary.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Doyle error was an easy fix. They probably just went over the "natl" with a limestone crayon. So they found it early, fixed it quickly- probably didn't even need to remove the stone from the press, and went on printing.
Magie was a tougher fix, requiring the stone to be redone, or perhaps partly redone. If it was caught early, it might have been worth doing. I think the names were the only thing done in that brown color. Maybe Magee saw the card and complained? The other name/team problems may not have been caught till later, or not caught at all. So if you're running the factory, and find a mistake after you've printed say 9000 of 10000 sheets do you have a new stone done to fix it? Then have to decide wether to ship the incorrect ones or 9000 wrong ones and 1000 right ones? Or do you just get like Sgt Schultz ( I see nothing!) and finish the print run and ship them? Keeping in mind that these were pack stiffeners and just happened to have some sort of subject printed on them as a free giveaway, I'd finish the run and ship them if there wasn't a complaint. Steve B |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It was more important to meet production quotas and schedule deadlines than to make sure there were no spelling errors. This was business.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, what are thoughts on something like this (not talking about the asking price necessarily, but, just that I know of several errors like this, where names are misspelled, etc., and nobody seems to know of more than a handful of examples of the misspelling...)
http://www.ebay.com/itm/T206-Gus-Dop...item19ca2267c9 ...so, if you're able to find a name misspelled, and submit to PSA for example, and find it is the only graded one known (ie, '1 of 1'), and have it slabbed with the misspelling called out in the description, does that put it in the same league as Magie? (ie, is this 'Dopner' worth anything?) ...also, has anyone figured out what the red 'B / 8', or whatever it is, is?? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The jury is still out on these unintended printing glitches. They often sell for a lot of money, but not all serious T206 collectors embrace them. They differ from Doyle or Magie as they were not the result of a deliberate revision, but were caused by a foreign substance getting onto the plate and blocking a bit of the ink. Whether or not they are worth the money is subjective.
You're confusing genuine printing corrections with unintentional printing mishaps. Big difference. Last edited by barrysloate; 11-03-2011 at 12:13 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The answer could be simply that after they fixed the Magee error, and the cost was submitted to the boss, they said "No more expensive fixes!"
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's my thought though...using the 'Dopner' one as just an example...the 'p' instead of an 'r' seems to be more than just a printing mishap caused by a foreign substance, etc. - PSA slabbed the 'p', so it would appear that the stone actually had 'Dopner' on it, and then later it was changed to 'Dorner' - ie, the 'p' was intentionally fixed to an 'r' at some point by the printer...so is this just an un-documented error that was intentionally corrected?...and, this is a '1 of 1', so apparently it's very rare...why isn't this talked about as much as Magie?...that's what I'd like to read more on...how did the Magie and Nat'l corrections become so legendary, when it would seem that there are other corrections that are similarly as rare, yet just weren't documented in the same way, for some reason...
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T201 Mecca, T205 Gold, T206 White, OM T210-3 | npa589 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 14 | 10-21-2011 07:01 PM |
T206's for sale | WabitTwax | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 6 | 10-26-2009 09:56 AM |
Joe Doyle of T206 N.Y. Nat'l variation fame | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 01-13-2009 03:41 PM |
T206 Joe Doyle Question (or "The Uncommon Common") | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-20-2007 12:37 PM |
T206 Doyle Nat'l Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-18-2007 04:49 PM |