![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Id think that one with the stray N is a printing error.
You can see parts of the an from the line above, and a bit of "sb" from Pittsburgh as well. It's probably what's called a "kiss print" where the paper is set onto the type, but slightly off, then moved into the correct position and printed. In this case it looks like the paper was touched while on the type in the wrong spot so the area printed came out pretty solid. Usually it's more like a light hint of doubling. Unless the backs are lithographed, then ignore all the above as it's a typography thing. Steve B |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Discovery - New E121-Like Back Variation Found! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 21 | 07-21-2008 08:49 PM |
T205 Possible back variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-27-2008 09:06 AM |
For Sale e94 Crawford sgc-40--tough olive variation-- SOLD | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 01-27-2007 04:43 PM |
T205 Back Variation Scarcity Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 05-16-2005 12:29 PM |
T205 back variation comment | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-12-2004 08:53 PM |