Trimmed Card Crossover

[Brendan]

I thought these two images he posted awhile back were interesting.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by Brendan

I thought these two images he posted awhile back were interesting.

Ahh, there it is. I said Bobby Jones, but I meant Walter Hagen. That doesn't prove anything. It could have been microtrimmed after it was removed from the SGC holder. Show a card that resides in an SGC holder that has been significantly overgraded. Bet you can't do it.

[Brendan]

Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy

Ahh, there it is. I said Bobby Jones, but I meant Walter Hagen. That doesn't prove anything. It could have been microtrimmed after it was removed from the SGC holder. Show a card that resides in an SGC holder that has been significantly overgraded. Bet you can't do it.

Some might say that card I posted was significantly undergraded. (if it wasn't trimmed) Anyway, it isn't my argument and personally I like SGC better because I really can't stand PSA's holders.

[bobbyw8469]

You got me David. I microtrimmed a SGC 3 that looked like a 5.....PSA said it was trimmed, then SGC said it was trimmed.....SGC made NO mistake....they are 100% PERFECT (note the heavy sarcasm)......

[bobbyw8469]

Show a card that resides in an SGC holder that has been significantly overgraded. Bet you can't do it.

Any more dirt on this card, and I'm gonna douse it with Woolite!!!

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

Any more dirt on this card, and I'm gonna douse it with Woolite!!!

Bobby, do you comprehend the English language? I asked you to post a scan of a card that was overgraded, not a card with a flaw. Stevie Wonder can see that the card is dirty, however the grade reflects it. In other words, the card looks like it would have graded a 5 or 5.5 w/o the stain, so SGC knocked off a couple of points for the stain. What's the problem?

[vintagetoppsguy]

Bobby, let me break it down so even you can understand it. Show me a SGC card with a significant flaw that they missed (e.g paper loss, major crease, a card that does not fall within their standards for centering, etc).

[bobbyw8469]

You are such a hater. Why don't you just grow up and realize SGC is NOT perfect. PSA would NEVER grade that card a 3! Horrible....the back looked worse than the front! You are so closed minded with hatred. I refuse to answer any more of your posts.

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

You are such a hater. Why don't you just grow up and realize SGC is NOT perfect. PSA would NEVER grade that card a 3! Horrible....the back looked worse than the front! You are so closed minded with hatred. I refuse to answer any more of your posts.

Bobby, you're absolutely right - SGC is not perfect. I don't believe that and I've never said that. All I'm saying is that for the amount of cards they grade, PSA makes far more mistakes than SGC. It's not even close.

Bobby, be honest with yourself, me and the rest of the board. If not for the dirt, what do you think the card would have graded?

[vintagetoppsguy]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

PSA would NEVER grade that card a 3!

Yeah, but they would grade this card a 5. Please explain to me the difference, Bobby.

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by bobbyw8469

You are such a hater. Why don't you just grow up and realize SGC is NOT perfect. PSA would NEVER grade that card a 3! Horrible....the back looked worse than the front! You are so closed minded with hatred. I refuse to answer any more of your posts.

PSA would grade that card a 6, you're right.