![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correct. That was the first thing I noticed. Whenever I look at a PSA card, that is the first thing I look for because they tend to ignore or overlook minor paper loss like that. I'm guessing SGC will grade it a 1.5 or 2.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My guess would be an SGC 30
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Amazing. I never expected these comments. Does PSA overlook such traits only w/pre-war or do they grade with the same standards on post-war?
Is this viewed as a weakness of PSA or just "their grading style"? Last edited by John V; 09-15-2011 at 06:50 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm bias, so I'll let someone answer. However, even w/o the ink or paper loss, it still should not have graded a 5. From their own website a PSA 5 "must be 85/15 or better on the front and 90/10 or better on the back." That is definitely not 90/10 centering on the back. I'll ge generous and call it 97/3
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
my guesses.....SGC would grade it a 20 or 30....BVG would grade it a 1.5 to 2......There are some small amounts of paper loss on the back, where the factory markings are, along with the ink? spots.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Funny this discussion about paper loss. I just got this Eclipse Ruth in today (from Legendary). The first picture is from the Legendary listing, which was obviously too small, and I should've probably asked for a larger scan. Lesson learned.
So if I cracked this card out, would it be able to make it into a PSA 3 holder? Or if I cracked it out, would it even make it back into an SGC 40/3 holder? The card is very nice looking except for the paper loss in front. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary,
If you're talking about the bottom edge, I consider that wear, not paper loss. It would be like saying a card with rounded corners has paper loss. Example: The Duffy below has rounded corners. I am sure the corners were sharp when the card left the factory. Does that mean it has paper loss? No, it's considered wear altough technically the paper is no longer there. Anyway, that's my opinion, but I would love to hear others. ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need some help with PSA grading question! | npa589 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 06-22-2011 08:27 PM |
SGC Crossover question from a Rookie | joebrandon1977 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 03-09-2011 04:48 AM |
PSA to SGC crossover question | Section103 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 02-03-2011 07:50 PM |
Oliver Optics Magazine question | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 0 | 02-17-2008 12:17 PM |
Question about this Christy Mathewson item (scanned) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-20-2002 06:33 PM |