![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll take beginning, middle, and end (though not in that order). '65, '69, and '60.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
GHG---I am not sure either and know the same hobby lore, but could not find anything to support it. Maybe someone else can help on that. I do know that although selling the cards with a cookie rather then gum got Fleer around the exclusive Topps contracts, there was apparently little interest by kids in 1963 for cards with a stale cookie as opposed to stale gum. I have an unopened 63 pack. Can you imagine what that cookie is like today, and what if any impact it has had on the top card.
I do have and like the 63 Fleer set and would rank it ahead of some of the Topps 60s sets in terms of appearance. I also liked the modern retro set Fleer put out in that style ( not sure what year it was). Al Last edited by ALR-bishop; 09-06-2011 at 09:41 PM. Reason: addition |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rough order of preference always subject to change:
67 - just beautiful, best Topps set ever 65 - dynamic 60 - horizontal layout with two pics 64 - sharp, simple, fun coin scratch back 63 - two pics 66 - straightforward, nice color 61 - plain but appealing 69 - meh 62 - sticker peeling off a woodgrained background 68 - burlap sack |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Best Backs- 1963 & 1969.
Overall I'd go with the 1960 & 1965 sets. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It's kinda tough to pick one. It seems like most of the sets are pretty bland or just bad in the case of the '62 and '68 sets. If I was forced to pick one I'd go with the '69 set, but IMO any of the '50s Topps sets are better.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1.) 1967--Great photography, clean cards and outstanding high numbers.
2.) 1963--Clean multi-color design and great rookie selection 3.) 1965--Best design of the decade 4.) 1961--Clean set with outstanding high numbers. 5.) 1962--Busy but appealing design. Great subsets and classic floating head rookie high numbers 6.) 1960--Guess I'm the only one not in love with the design. Yaz and high numbers saves this. 7.) 1964--Clean design but bland with weak player selection 8.) 1968--Rookies and specialty cards are nice. Design....not so much 9.) 1966--Boring and bland. Rookies save this from total suckiness 10.) 1969--Boring |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My top three would be:
1. 1967 2. 1965 3. 1961 And bringing up the rear would be the 1968 set. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2003 Topps 205 Relics/Auto set A Journey | darrend505 | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 2 | 08-10-2011 08:26 PM |
Hey Big Spender | Yankeefan51 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 119 | 06-27-2011 07:27 PM |
Just need two cards to complete my w590 set (Ruth & Spencer) please help!! | shammus | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-24-2009 11:38 AM |
Questions for Set Collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 07-01-2006 11:03 PM |
Complete graded Mayo set - finally made the goal !! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 19 | 05-18-2006 06:57 PM |