![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Allowing consignors to bid on their own items, win their own items, auction houses lying about their ownership of items, etc.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Auction LOA's and pre certified is something that need to change. With some of the things I have seen authenticators authenticate, I have no doubt many times these authenticators do not look at the items.
Sadly the auction houses do not hold them accountable. They just assume it is an honest mistake when in reality it is painfully obvious to people with autograph knowledge that they did not even look at them. I recently returned an autograph lot to an auction house because of the large number of fakes. Not only fakes but obvious fakes that took me no more than three minutes to know there were major issues. To the credit of the auction house, they allowed me to return for a refund. However, what I would like to see even more is the auction house to start holding this "authenticator" responsible for this garbage. The sad part is whoever forged the signatures, didn't even try to sign like the player. They just signed however they wanted to and somehow these passed the "authentication process"! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Auction LOA's,,, pre-certified,,, just more mumbo jumbo from authentication services.
You either examine an item or not. Why are they allowed to get away with this? "Well, yeah, we sort of looked at that autograph before the auction, but if you want us to REALLY look at it, ya gotta pay up, sucka."
__________________
Sign up & receive my autograph price list. E mail me,richsprt@aol.com, with your e mail. Sports,entertainment,history. - Here is a link to my online store. Many items for sale. 10% disc. for 54 members. E mail me first. www.bonanza.com/booths/richsports -- "I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure."- Clarence Darrow |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
on their websites, these companies state that the purchaser of the auction item should really send it in to ensure their highest level of service.
they are admitting you are getting their lowest level to begin with. a 'preliminary' inspection. preliminary just means sub-standard, why anyone should put up with that is a question i would like these auction houses to answer. the drunk guy packed your chute, but if you pay us extra money, you can ensure our highest service of packing your chute. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Anyone have any idea what authenticators typically charge auction houses for these en masse authentications? Do they do it by the total number of lots, number of pieces, by the hour, by the day? Clearly it's not equivalent to adding up their standard rate for each individual signed item, but I'm just curious as to how they go about it.
If there's a previous thread that addresses this, I'd be happy for a point in the right direction. There's so much bashing and discussion of TPA's that it's hard to do a search for it. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
The sad part about the lot I purchased, it was about 350 cards. I myself could personally go through in about 15 minutes and pull out the questionable ones. Questionable meaning either I know they are fake or questionable meaning I have not seen many examples of that person's autograph. Sadly about 30% of this lot were without question bad. WIth another 20% highly questionable. There were forgeries of Harry Carson and Charlie Joiner in this lot. Guys who have signed TTM for years and their signatures haven't changed much at all if any, and they didn't even look like the person TRIED to form the letters correctly. How does someone who is a "professional" authenticator not know what a Charlie Joiner autograph looks like?! These auction houses need to start being more careful because you are letting these guys scam you. Many times they are not even looking at this stuff. I used to question if they looked at them, after this last lot, I know without question this authenticator did not look at them. As I said in previous post, the auction house allowed me to return it but if they continue to not hold these people accountable for their "mistakes" they will have lost my business. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To follow up from my original post, Dan from SCP eventually did reach out to my friend over the weekend to offer a refund on the item if he would like, since they do not have the photomatch to authenticate the nameplate (which is why the item got the bids which it did).
The tough thing - my friend really wants to keep the nameplate, but bid higher on it because it was supposed to have a photomatch. So he now has to decide whether to return for the refund offered, or keep it at the full price despite not being fully as described. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
He can always ask for a partial refund. If SCP were any good at customer service, that would have been one of the options from the start (although, if they were any good, they would have the photomatch to begin with).
Joshua |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ask what day is the very latest you can return it, and in the meantime try to find a photo match yourself.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Customer Service at Auction Houses | bcbgcbrcb | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-22-2009 06:38 PM |
WTB: c1897 Cy Young Cigar Box - SCP Auction | Archive | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 02-23-2009 05:05 PM |
Popularity of Web Auctions Helps Fuel Growth in Live Auction Industry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-26-2007 09:29 AM |
Mastro Auctions -- Black Sox information on their next auction | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-17-2007 07:40 PM |
Bigsbee's Auction Service | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-15-2002 02:45 PM |