 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should be labeled as "Missing red ink" | |||
| Yes |
   
|
18 | 26.47% |
| No |
  
|
50 | 73.53% |
| Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
08-25-2011, 07:42 AM
|
||||
|
||||
chemical reaction probably...the discolored gold border is the giveaway...if it was just missing the ink, the border would still be more "golden." But the border looks oxidized. I have a t-80 that is very similar.
the bright red back might be different as well. I am fairly certain that the inks used on the front were different from the inks on the back and tend to survive soaking better. Or another theory...this was soaked prior to the back printing, meaning something spilled on the sheet before the back was printed (I am fairly certain the backs and fronts were printed separately). Joshua 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vintage baseball card missing links? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 06-20-2008 01:03 PM |
| Caramel/Tobacco cards that are missing a color layer.... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 10-11-2007 08:05 PM |
| E94 Doolan missing ink back from SGC | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 5 | 06-24-2006 07:37 PM |
| Possibly unique E94 missing ink error-Taking Offers | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 6 | 05-07-2006 05:09 PM |
| T206 colors missing scraps versus issued cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 02-10-2006 01:59 AM |
Threaded Mode