![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pat is right, they will only give 1 qualifier and the "MK" is the one it would receive. Even w/o the MK, it would still get ST or even OC (top to bottom centering) qualifier. I think the card is a 5 MK, in which case I also agree with Pat that it's not worth grading.
I bought a PSA 5 MK 1/3 checklist for my set on eBay. I looked all over, front and back and I could not see a mark. I cracked it out and finally saw one slight little pencil mark on the surface of the card (and it wasn't even in one of the check boxes). It looked like a pencil had accidentally brushed up against the card. In fact, it was so minor I am surprised they even noticed it. I lightly erased the mark and now it is displayed with my raw set. I am still looking for a nice 2/4 checklist. I think I paid $20 or $30 for mine if that helps and that's why I agree it's not worth grading. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: Low Grade 20 Card T206 Lot **SOLD** | marcdelpercio | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 03-05-2011 12:00 AM |
2010 National Pickups,Pics, and Post | Pup6913 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 110 | 02-10-2011 05:40 PM |
Why grade a card missing a HUGE chunk? | lhoyle | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 11-24-2010 02:44 PM |
**POLL** How will this card grade? Graded VG/EX | John V | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 10-01-2010 09:43 PM |
WTB: Very low grade 55' Clemente Rookie Card | Marc Simmons | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-06-2010 04:17 PM |