New T205 Variations PB Doc White

[marcdelpercio]

Here's a link to the original thread I posted. You can probably guess how I'm voting

http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...Bear+doc+white

There is absolutely NO difference between this and the Matty Cycle other than ones a HOF'er and the other isn't. Why would we not recognize this for the set??

[marcdelpercio]

There are only two possible ways that one can catalog a "master set".

You can catalog every possible front/back combo of every card. In this case, this card would be listed separately as "Doc White, Polar Bear". The quote marks are irrelevant.

..or..

You can catalog every different design, regardless of the ad back. In this case this card would still be listed separately as "Doc White, no quotes". The ad back is irrelevant.

Either way, this card (and all other similar variations) would be catalogued separately. Some people apparently have an issue with the term, "variation". Okay...call it whatever you like...but if you are listing a master set, I see no logical argument for how this card could not be listed separately.

[Tcards-Please]

Originally Posted by Pup6913

Why would we not recognize this for the set??

Originally Posted by Pup6913

Don't need your reasoning just need a vote

Besides your initial post stating "Don't need your reasoning", this was discussed previously in length 2 years ago.

r/
Frank

Originally Posted by T's please

Besides your initial post stating "Don't need your reasoning", this was discussed previously in length 2 years ago.

r/
Frank

WOW Frank!!! Really!! What the beef?????

[Tcards-Please]

Andrew,

No beef, I was just pointing out that you originally said don't need your reasoning, just a vote, then you ask for dialog later. So I'm sure some people took you up on the initial request of just vote. Plus this was talked about in great detail by those with knowledge and interests 2 years ago, so there wasn't much more to add to your thread.

r/
Frank

Originally Posted by T's please

Andrew,

No beef, I was just pointing out that you originally said don't need your reasoning, just a vote, then you ask for dialog later. So I'm sure some people took you up on the initial request of just vote. Plus this was talked about in great detail by those with knowledge and interests 2 years ago, so there wasn't much more to add to your thread.

r/
Frank

It's always good to revisit the talks of the past to see what the hobbies mind is on the subject at hand. So far the vote is in favor of it being a variation.

FYI I own one in Very Poor condition so no invested interest here for sure

[peterb69]

I actually only joined this forum less the a year ago and never saw that original thread. Unfortunately, I am now looking for a Polar Bear Doc White to add to my "master" set.

What I don't understand however, if the majority agree that it is a Polar Bear version similar to the Matthewson Cycle version, then why doesn't it get onto major checklists? Beckett, SCD, PSA, SGC.......